So if Dominion was switching votes or weighting votes differently, wouldn't we have seen that in this Georgia recount...? I mean I realize there are ways to cover for it, but just also curious what people think....
Comments (5)
sorted by:
So if Dominion was switching votes or weighting votes differently, wouldn't we have seen that in this Georgia recount...? I mean I realize there are ways to cover for it, but just also curious what people think....
Looks like they were verifying that they had x numbers of ballots in each lot but not verifying what was on the votes matched what was reported, since that is recanvassing, not recounting. Then after finding "missing" paper or missing electronic tabulation numbers they were typically just noting the discrepancy since it was not an audit. Thanks to this we now know recounts are only useful for finding "lost" batches that were never added to tallies.
No because they weren’t matching signatures and they still wouldn’t let our poll watchers near enough to observe
It took them about 8 hours from their scheduled announce time to announce the count even though it was the "Same" as they had reported when they finished counting last night. The answer is it's a lie, I don't believe the count in the slightest, they are lying. It took 8 hours for the SOS to talk to all the muckity mucks and get assurances that they would be protected when they lied. This is my hypothesis.
Yeah, was just a thought I had, if they are willing to pull off this level of fraud, then of course they have contingency for a recount.
https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1329110955020709894