I watched the whole segment. He's down with Rudy's angle, but skeptical of Powell's.
What is wrong with that? It's his opinion. He wasn't dishonest. I totally get that she is probably holding a lot of the nukes close and saving them for court. But that doesn't mean a journalist still won't try to find out info.
There's been an anti-Tucker shill effort on this site for a while and I feel like we are falling for it as they strike hard on this chance to make us think he "betrayed" us.
Obviously yeah if he starts shilling and lying, I'll be totally against that. But I watched the full segment and he was not shilling and lying, he was reasonable as usual, cautiously optimistic, and partially skeptical.
My personal outlook is much more high energy, but if Powell proves Tuck wrong that's a good thing, not a bad thing.
Tucker is an intelligent guy, he should realize that no attorney, worth a crap anyways, would ever show their evidence to the media before presenting it in court. That's first year law school stuff there. Why would you give the defense extra opportunity to discredit your evidence just to appease some talking head.
So that I agree with. But I think he just doesn't get why she wouldn't come on the show. Fox cucked out overall, no doubt, but Tucker hasn't been dishonest yet that I've seen.
Again, if he starts being lame and low energy constantly, even if it's not dishonest, then yeah, I won't be into that.
But being skeptical of one facet of the legal strategy (he was pretty hype about Rudy's angle) is an acceptable opinion I feel.
Hey, I want her to release the kraken and prove him wrong 1000 times over.