I watched the whole segment. He's down with Rudy's angle, but skeptical of Powell's.
What is wrong with that? It's his opinion. He wasn't dishonest. I totally get that she is probably holding a lot of the nukes close and saving them for court. But that doesn't mean a journalist still won't try to find out info.
There's been an anti-Tucker shill effort on this site for a while and I feel like we are falling for it as they strike hard on this chance to make us think he "betrayed" us.
Obviously yeah if he starts shilling and lying, I'll be totally against that. But I watched the full segment and he was not shilling and lying, he was reasonable as usual, cautiously optimistic, and partially skeptical.
My personal outlook is much more high energy, but if Powell proves Tuck wrong that's a good thing, not a bad thing.
Tucker is an intelligent guy, he should realize that no attorney, worth a crap anyways, would ever show their evidence to the media before presenting it in court. That's first year law school stuff there. Why would you give the defense extra opportunity to discredit your evidence just to appease some talking head.