34
Comments (4)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
bobjones123 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'd be cautious listening to Crowder, he's generally wrong on his assertions on figures (he's not an expert).

I'd wait until some of our resident autipedes can get on this to see what's up.

1
killerbunny88 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

He even admits on the video that he could be wrong. He just found something very troubling that he hadn't seen many people talking about. I try not to post things that people claim are fact without the facts. I felt like he did a good job of not claiming anything outright and he asked for people to correct him if he was wrong.

0
bobjones123 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah, I'm just really cautious about these voter comparison videos youtubers are doing.

Almost all of them have turned out to be wrong, like the Dr Shiva stuff was all a bust - as it seems he doesn't understand statistics or deliberately misinterpreted the figures.

I'd say if anything these videos the youtubers are doing may be more for advertising revenue & to gain pateron subscribers. Using our justfied anger to make a quick buck off some unsubstantiated claims.

1
killerbunny88 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I definitely agree with having caution.... I wasn't trying to spread disinformation. I find it helpful for myself to get others feedback when I find something interesting. I post it to see what other people have heard or read about. Statistics/math isn't my forte, so I was hoping someone on here would comment and correct anything Crowder got wrong. I usually post a disclaimer, and the only reason I didn't this time is because Crowder gave himself a disclaimer on the video. I definitely understand your concern, and I hope you understand where I'm coming from :)