16
Comments (63)
sorted by:
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
0
Ideologicalpede 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just a friendly reminder to check not a robots comment history and decide for your self if he should be deported.

-9
bohlah00 [S] -9 points ago +4 / -13

But that's not on Tucker. That's on dems. Tucker position is reasonable, you make big claims, you show us how you got there.

When dems accused Trump of being Russian asset, and they said they have the evidence but can't share it because "confidential", Tucker was the first to call them out. Being consistent is good. I am also standing and praying for Powell. Release the Kraken, enough tick tack.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
Anaconda 2 points ago +6 / -4

Fuck off Cucker cultist.

He is friends with Hunter Biden and said Hunter is not a bad person. Why do you suck Cucker's cock?

10
Gunslinger1776 10 points ago +10 / -0

It wasn’t what he said, it was how he said it. I’m paraphrasing here but he said “we cover UFOs on this show because there’s EVIDENCE of such” then went after Powell? That was a bridge too far.

He hasn’t covered the evidence we talk about daily here. I’m no journalist, I’m just a blue collar working class guy, and I know about it. He IS a journalist, so why doesn’t he know about it? (hint: he does)

-8
bohlah00 [S] -8 points ago +2 / -10

You are being bais, rewatch it with fresh mind, and you will know. Also remember that Tucker is no angel, but he is in our side and pushing him aside and accusing him of being owned is in my opinion is a mistake.

1
Anaconda 1 point ago +5 / -4

Fuck off Cucker cultist.

He is friends with Hunter Biden and said Hunter is not a bad person. Why do you suck Cucker's cock?

-3
bohlah00 [S] -3 points ago +2 / -5

Where the fuck this left mentality came from? So what if he known hunter before? They both lived in the same neighborhood. He said he had demons but kept them under control at the time he knew him. Since when this doom is against freedom of speech?

2
trumptrain11 2 points ago +3 / -1

"He said he had demons but kept them under control at the time he knew him.">

I've always marveled at this statement/admission by Tucker. I'd like to know exactly how Tucker knew that Hunter kept his demons under control at the time he knew him.

Ridiculous statement by Tuck. Though on reflection, I think "cunning statement" is more apt.

9
Misterraise 9 points ago +10 / -1

Thousand of affidavits not enough? Publicly available information that all swing state's voting machine are owned by communists? Clearly fraudulent spikes of 100% Joe Biden votes at 4 am? Countless videos of proof of conspiracy to steal the election reported by actual journalists? Sorry, I believe Tucker Carlson is an asshole who is good at Propaganda, but I don't believe he is oblivious to what is happening. He is acting purposefully ignorant. A congressman even confirmed the server raid in Germany. What is Tucker waiting for? A recorded confession by Joe Biden that he stole the election? Give me a break.

1
qwertyuiop123 1 point ago +3 / -2

I feel like no one here actually watched the segment. He went through all the affidavits and stuff many times. This segment was specifically referring to her claims that the voting machines were hacked from Germany to count votes badly, for which she has given no evidence yet.

6
Misterraise 6 points ago +6 / -0

Congress members confirmed the server raid in Germany. Would Tucker like to be invited into the Pentagon to see for himself, before the courts do? Tucker is pay to play. I don't think he is stupid.

0
qwertyuiop123 0 points ago +1 / -1

No one is questioning that they raided the servers. This has nothing to do with anything.

4
Misterraise 4 points ago +4 / -0

It does. Why are your votes being transmitted to be stored in foreign countries, by foreign machines, that are used in Countries like Venezuela, and in their own handbook advertises the feature of "switching votes"? Does Tucker think that is not news worthy? What would be newsworthy? Arresting Satan himself at the location of the servers? The media keeps raising the bar for what they would find as acceptable evidence. The evidence is undeniable and Tucker is acting like there is nothing, which is very misleading to say the least. Maybe he could start by reaching out to Dominion, and Democrat official on how they thought it was appropriate to have voter data stored overseas by a private company owned largely by a communist? Or maybe he can keep pretending he hasn't seen anything.

1
qwertyuiop123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does Tucker think that is not news worthy?

Yes he has discussed these things many times at length and even talks about it in this segment where he makes it clear there should be no voting machines allowed. This doesn't change the fact that everyone knew the information was being sent there and this has been public information for years. If Trump thought this alone was a problem he needed to bring it up before the election, not after he lost.

Public information about a server overseas is not relevant to her claims of a secret program to hack the machines.

3
Misterraise 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's in the machine's manual! The feature to flip votes, how is that not relevant? Tucker is witnessing mountains of evidence of the biggest act of Treason in the history of the USA.

You know how the took down the mafia? Not by their past crimes, but by catching them red-handed in the act. I believe Trump saw the perfect opportunity during the election to expose all the metaphorical "deep state" operatives. He saw an opportunity to take them down, and he had the courage to do so.

Here's a wallpaper I made for one of my favorite Trump quotes, which is relevant to our discussion. Also I appreciate the great conversation we are having pede!

https://thedonald.win/p/11QRfUKBsN/we-love-you-mister-president/c/

1
qwertyuiop123 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's in the machine's manual!

All the machines have this, and have had this feature for 20 years. You do understand that if you say you have shocking new evidence of fraud, then it can't be something that was public knowledge for 20 years.

Ok that's great about the Mafia but I do not understand what that has to do with tucker.

It is a fact that Sidney Powell has not presented any of her evidence for the things she has said. Tucker does not want to go down on that ship if it turns out she doesn't have any. It is simple. And he didn't say anything that wasn't true in his segment, he presented the facts.

-5
bohlah00 [S] -5 points ago +2 / -7

Tucker is a TV show guy. Powellhad the opportunity to make her case in his show for the entire hour and she refused. Not saying she doesn't have a case, but Tucker frustrations are justified. he is not an angel, but also not an asshole or propagandist

5
Misterraise 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why doesn't Tucker call one of the many brave Patriots who's names are public and have testified under oath? Why doesn't he invite data analysts to discuss the obvious fraud presented by the insane numbers? Why doesn't he speak to the team at Project Versailles about the countless hours of undercover footage proving fraud? Why doesn't he discuss the publicly available information about the communist ownership of Dominion? Why doesn't he discuss one of dominions chiefs being on the Biden "transition team"? Tucker is playing stupid. Pede, there are countless people who are going to try and deceive you in life, the least you can do is not deceive yourself. Look at this honestly. Tucker is pay to play.

-1
bohlah00 [S] -1 points ago +3 / -4

He was covering Powell claims, which I believe her 100%, to make her case and give her 100% of his show time to discuss it in front of the American people. She refused.

Tucker has done a lot of what you are pretending he didn't do. No one else is even talking about this shit but him. I am starting to think there is an Operation here to divide us over him

4
Misterraise 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pede, please. News networks have been talking about this, and they have been saying what Tucker has "no evidence of fraud". He is purposefully acting oblivious.

Don't tell me he was "covering Powell's claims", when many of her claims could be proven easily with publicly available records, like Dominion ownership, interviews of Dominion officials saying they successfully "swapped 1 million votes to the paying candidate in one election in an unnamed country." He could easily contact data analysts to crosscheck the numbers and how fraud is mathematically proven. He could easily contact Project Versailles on their undercover reporting with video evidence of said fraud. But he only wants to hear it from Powell's mouth?

This isn't a division operation. Its clear where we stand, and where Patriots stand. With liberty, freedom, and human decency. Tucker overestimated his influence, he wasn't popular because he was "Tucker", he was popular because it seemed like he stood with the people. Now that it has become obvious he doesn't, people checked out.

-3
bohlah00 [S] -3 points ago +1 / -4

Release the Kraken on Tucker show

5
Misterraise 5 points ago +5 / -0

It has been released, my friend. Its every where. Hell, if Tucker Carlson invited ME on his show I could share undeniable and awesome amounts of evidence to the claims he says "has no grounds". I bet you could go on his show and prove it! Tucker is not a hero, he is a tv personality, like you said, following the biggest paycheck.

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
-5
qwertyuiop123 -5 points ago +3 / -8

No you guys are playing dumb. Tucker went over all the evidence that was shared and informed his viewers of exactly what is happening. Then he pointed out the Powell had not shared any evidence of the German electronic hack of voting machines, which is by far the most astounding of her claims, and would make this the most serious event in America's history.

He is the most watched show in America, he can't come out and just say TICK TOCK, IT'S HAPPENING, 1776 BITCHES!!!. His audience expects him to present evidence and be factually correct. Honestly this is just common sense.

3
QuantumReality 3 points ago +4 / -1

He is on a network, controlled by the same interests as all the others, they fucking shut him down. You're an idiot. This is why they had him build up trust, si the exact moment we needed him the most, he would betray us. It's the same reason they called Arizona.

1
qwertyuiop123 1 point ago +1 / -0

You think they had him build up trust to then go and methodically present all the evidence of massive voter fraud committed by the Democrats? Brilliant hypothesis.

-6
bohlah00 [S] -6 points ago +2 / -8

You can't guarantee because you can't read minds

5
Anaconda 5 points ago +9 / -4

Fuck off Cucker cultist.

He is friends with Hunter Biden and said Hunter is not a bad person. Why do you suck Cucker's cock?

8
hulda824 8 points ago +8 / -0

Rudy specifically SAID, if they gave the press info, they either would not report it or twist it. Evidence belongs in Courts, not in the hands of journalists and commentators!!!

4
Anaconda 4 points ago +6 / -2

Cucker sucks!

-6
bohlah00 [S] -6 points ago +1 / -7

That's what pencil nick said. I hate it when it comes from both sides, and I understand why Tucker hate it too.

6
dindunufin2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Powell cannot and should not disperse any evidence publicly when preparing to try a case. WTF Tucker?

0
bohlah00 [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

That's her side. I also can acknowledge Tucker side of having the topic discussed and the evidence shown. He doesn't want to be sound like Rachel Maddow, even if the claims are true, which I do believe 100% true.

So he invites Powell and she refuses. And he report this as he always does.

He is not an angel, but also not in the evil side.

I stand with him

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
-3
bohlah00 [S] -3 points ago +2 / -5

It was not a hit. It was being consistent. I believe Powell and respect Tucker consistency of demanding evidence on big claims. He invited her and she rejected. I say release the Kraken and enough tick tack bullshit

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-4
bohlah00 [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

Release the Kraken

5
Scroon 5 points ago +5 / -0

He was making the fallacious argument that there is even less evidence for the election fraud than there is for UFOs. Do you stand with that?

-2
bohlah00 [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

His point is he welcomes every argument. The fraud as a known fact is only here, to be n TV and discuss it to convince the masses, you need to show the evidence. I hope the day the evidence is shared is as soon as today

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
-5
bohlah00 [S] -5 points ago +1 / -6

Fuck you and fuck fox. You are doing exactly what the left is doing, fucking by association

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
BerettaStroker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nobody "stands" with Tucker, they all bend over and spread cheeks for the cash, just like he does.

2
Randomroxks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why is he asking for evidence ? He Has access to some really good investigative teams and resources. It would be an ace up his sleeve that he goes and find his own evidence and support or contradict what Trump team is doing. He has gotten used to sitting in his arm chair and not working hard to get what he wants.

0
bohlah00 [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Accurate criticism. Still not justifying the new style of cancel culture in here

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
couranto 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fu

1
Fired4MaskRefusal 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is slow drip for normies.

1
dindunufin2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he is taking one for the team. He is eliminating the only life line Fox news has, his audience. He is playing the bad guy to get every last person to switch to NewsMax. Just my opinion.

-2
bohlah00 [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

Nah, I watched him since day 1. He just consistent on demanding the evidence directly from the person making the claim. Powell is making a big one that is changing the history of the country if true, and I believe 100% it is true, and given her the chance to discuss over his platform. She is refusing to release the Kraken

0
SoulFire 0 points ago +2 / -2

Reasonable points.

If it is true, that Sidney was offered to be on the show and declined...the question is, what did Fox demand for that time?

So...

0
bohlah00 [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

At least that's what Tucker is claiming, and Powell is not denying. He said he offered to give her the full hour to explain what she found and inform the people. She refused and informed his team and to contact her again. Very unreasonable when she is doing interviews in other shows.

I like Trump style, go and do interviews even with hustle shows to get his view out. She can too.

-1
SoulFire -1 points ago +1 / -2

Agree, What is legal for her to answer...do...and what is not, decline.

-1
dunedan -1 points ago +1 / -2

you're right, op, tucker's still fine. good on you for talking to everyone here.

-2
dankai420 -2 points ago +5 / -7

Exactly, thats healthy skepticism, Tucker is one of the few people on mainstream media that are talking about voter fraud, lets not attack him.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Anaconda 4 points ago +7 / -3

Nah. Fuck Cucker. Always been a backstabbing deep-stater. And fuck his cult of personality

0
dankai420 0 points ago +2 / -2

We're isolated enough in the media, Tucker Carlson is a good egg.