That's why it has to be a full story. Observers prevented from witnessing things, or told that the counting was done, and 150,000 votes end up being counted and go Joe's way. Statistically improbable outcomes, like beating Obama's totals but only in the cities in that mattered. The 17 bellwether counties being almost all reliable for decades and this year it was all of 3 or 1 that was "right". Some counties with more votes than registered voters.
So, maybe no eyewitness proof of the software manipulation, but the software was capable of it, and the actions to cover the counting activities plus the statistically improbable results are there. So the legislatures have to take back their right to decide.
Also, the testimony is about what Smartmatic did, not what Dominion did. One needs evidence that Dominion is using Smartmatic machines. There is a loose connection only, no hard evidence of this has been revealed to us yet.
What it CAN do and what it DID do are two different things unfortunately.
I hear a lot of what it can do. It could be a really difficult thing to prove after the fact.
You don't necessarily have to have proof of exactly how the fraud is done if there's enough evidence to not trust the results.
The courts must allow us to crack the machines open.
The proof will be there lying on the table in the form of paper ballots. They can’t fake 100k signatures. They can’t make the dead come to life.
If any court has the balls to even take it that far.
We will keep showing up at the state capitols until they do.
Is this not what we have had to endure for the past 6 months? Time to take the fight back to them.
That's why it has to be a full story. Observers prevented from witnessing things, or told that the counting was done, and 150,000 votes end up being counted and go Joe's way. Statistically improbable outcomes, like beating Obama's totals but only in the cities in that mattered. The 17 bellwether counties being almost all reliable for decades and this year it was all of 3 or 1 that was "right". Some counties with more votes than registered voters.
So, maybe no eyewitness proof of the software manipulation, but the software was capable of it, and the actions to cover the counting activities plus the statistically improbable results are there. So the legislatures have to take back their right to decide.
Also, the testimony is about what Smartmatic did, not what Dominion did. One needs evidence that Dominion is using Smartmatic machines. There is a loose connection only, no hard evidence of this has been revealed to us yet.