90
posted ago by Hollywoodspypede ago by Hollywoodspypede +94 / -4

They have presented no evidence. They have made an opening statement about the evidence they plan to present. They have presented no evidence yet. It's not time. That's all Tucker said. They have presented no evidence yet. When they present evidence let's see what all the other 'journalists' do. I think that may be the point he is making. Will they be as impartial about the evidence presented as he is about their being none now??

Comments (58)
sorted by:
51
kakeofpan 51 points ago +51 / -0

nope nope nope. you start off with a lie. everything else is invalid

tucker is pissed that sidney won't go on his show and save his ratings. No evidence. How many afiavits? each one is evidence. So the no evidence bullshit is just that bullshit. Its dishonest to imply no evidence. and It allows him to foolow fox's script while still appearing impartial. A true journalist would take what sidney released and "Investigate it themselves"

As for the rest of the evidence

There is no benefit to sidney powell to show her trump cards before her court date. To go on tuckers show to "show the evidence" just gives the guilty more time to prepare to counter.

23
Anaconda 23 points ago +28 / -5

OP is a Cucker cultist.

He could shit in their mouths and they would say delicious.

1
Hollywoodspypede [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow. You are really mean. He may be butt hurt she didn't go on his show. And he is probably getting pressure to denounce them. But all he REALLY said is they haven't presented the evidence yet. And he was a little bitchy and impatient about it. He has a show to do!! Sidney is in charge and he knows it. Calm down. Are you a reformed Bernie-bro or something?? LOL Trump hasn't made his move yet if you think about it. Not till the trial. Nothing matters till the trial. I'll try not to let your comment ruin my weekend :) Have a great weekend and just be patient.

13
Financial_mom 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think you nailed it with "Tucker is pissed she won't come on and save his ratings". It must be a ride awakening to him that we don't need his show to get our information.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
37
RodRod 37 points ago +37 / -0

A sworn affidavit IS evidence. Claiming the opposite is a lie. And that is a fact.

-18
Beachsamurai -18 points ago +2 / -20

Who collected it? Was the evidence preserved? Was it done by a properly trained individual or by SamSam from down the block?

Samsam can point in the direction but you gotta have auditors collecting it professionally and submitting it properly.

5
foom 5 points ago +6 / -1

You do realize we see through you?

-1
Beachsamurai -1 points ago +1 / -2

Youre an idiot. Check my post history I stand for what I said. Dude was always anti left. Gtfo that way ----->

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
Beachsamurai 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol

24
Wu_Flu_Ca_Choo 24 points ago +24 / -0

There's plenty of evidence out there about mass election fraud... I've seen it... you've seen it... we've all seen it... journalism is about uncovering facts and presenting them so the public can make informed decisions... propaganda is about influencing those decisions to suit a particular narrative which Cucker is doing... wake up and stop watching Faux News communist propaganda

-8
Beachsamurai -8 points ago +7 / -15

Evidence brought before the jury is different. You need the evidence to be untouched by professionals and trained forensic investigation.

Evidence is not presented like a baby ' ph look oh look here here..." Lol

9
Wtf_socialismreally 9 points ago +9 / -0

As a journalist you don't only show evidence brought to the jury.

They've quite literally never done that.

6
foom 6 points ago +6 / -0

That isn’t a real human you’re talking to.

18
QuantumReality 18 points ago +21 / -3

You're an idiot.

-15
Beachsamurai -15 points ago +5 / -20

He is right in a way. You gotta be impartial

15
Anaconda 15 points ago +19 / -4

OP is a Cucker cultist.

He could shit in their mouths and they would say delicious.

-13
Beachsamurai -13 points ago +4 / -17

That was unnecessary. OP is giving his opinion leta move on. Maybe that guy is being impartial because his job depends on it. He has kids and stuff....so if his network js anti american what can he do? He says he is impartial neither for or against.

1
ConservativeMom03 1 point ago +1 / -0

But Tucker and staff have gone to massive efforts on the lockdown stories and the Hunter's laptop... And it's like they won't even try to go out and gather any info... Just want everything proven on their show before the courts get to see it.

And I've read many of the affidavits myself, so I know they're available to the public if you cared to look.

18
bobjones123 18 points ago +18 / -0

Tucker Carlson, or as he should be known now - Cucker Carlson seems to be following the main media narrative. He was laying into Powell on Fox yesterday from how I interpreted.

-17
shadypollster -17 points ago +1 / -18

This is probably a waste of time considering the handshake icon but he was laying into Powell how? Because he said the words "she said no" and then expressed concern about not knowing what was going on? Did you watch the episode?

12
Anaconda 12 points ago +15 / -3

Aww look at the cucker cultists.

He could shit in your mouths and you all would say delicious.

9
bobjones123 9 points ago +9 / -0

Amen brother, Cucker is just another liberal elite trying to sow discord amongst GEOPOTUS PEDES

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

Handshake doesn't mean shit when you are supporting Trump.

-4
shadypollster -4 points ago +2 / -6

Good thing this post isn't about Trump then isn't it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
15
artifex_mundi_x 15 points ago +15 / -0

I've read a lot of affidavits, which is evidence.

14
Mamapedia 14 points ago +14 / -0

He implied, quite intentionally, that they have no valid case because there has been no evidence presented. It was not an impartial position. I did watch it. He was out out by their response to his producers. He was acting like a diva, not a journalist.

-7
Hollywoodspypede [S] -7 points ago +1 / -8

What I got was they have no valid case UNTIL they present evidence. Everyone is impatient. But like she said, this isn't a Law and Order episode. What I got was a 'put up or shut up' sort of taunt. This is going to play out in the courts not the media. And they have airtime to fill. I didn't get disloyalty. Just frustration and practicality. The next two weeks will be a nail biter.

14
komenos_9 14 points ago +14 / -0

Don’t watch him and never have but from the little I saw here He seems mad a lawyer didn’t go on his show.

Not sure but seems so. Like does he think someone’s going on his show to let all the evidence out the bag, outside of what they said in the press conference?

-11
shadypollster -11 points ago +3 / -14

That's the thing. What you saw here about "tucker being mad" wasn't the truth. It was a massive circle jerk.

11
Anaconda 11 points ago +16 / -5

Fuck all you Cucker cultists.

He could shit in their mouths and they would say delicious.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
komenos_9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm I changed my mind. Like I said, I’ve never watched him, but monologue going about a lawyer “getting mad” is not professional for a journalist that (you, but formerly many others) seem to hold as one of the few last standing heralds to an older style of media professionalism and bipartisanship.

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1329652945932201984

He kinda seems like he’s yapping like a little puppy.

0
shadypollster 0 points ago +1 / -1

I just am not seeing what you are saying here. He sounds like regular Tucker.

1
komenos_9 1 point ago +1 / -0

I gotcha.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
Anaconda 6 points ago +10 / -4

Fuck Cucker and his cultists like you.

He could shit in your mouth and you would say delicious.

5
Rotting_John_McCain 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Can't cuck the T---!" Welp.

4
cdnthought 4 points ago +4 / -0

They presented some affidavits publicly, which is evidence. Stop running the ball for Tucker. If he would take that must abs use it to dig himself, he'd get more. Statistical impossibility also exists and is evidence and could be reviewed. Evidence was presented and is available. Following that trail would be real journalism. He wants to have them do it for him, which would breach their ethics.

3
nickybops 3 points ago +3 / -0

TUCKER IS A FAGGOT.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Georgeb97 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't think his piece was too bad. Saying she hasn't shown it yet is ok, he never said she was lying he's just being fair. Was a little petty having a swipe at her for not appearing on the show though.

2
SellTheSun 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eye witness testimony isn't evidence? You can be found guilty of a crime and sent to prison based just on eye witness testimony. They have HUNDREDS of affidavits, sworn testimony of eye witnesses under oath, saying they witnessed voter fraud. That is a mountain of evidence

I don't even have to get into anything else, that alone proves you're a liar just like Tucker is. This is no time for retards and or liars to be given any benefit of the doubt - so fuck off ty.

2
HatnNewLognReqs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy unpopular opinion batman

2
Razamataz 2 points ago +2 / -0

You still watch Fox News, are you... GAY

1
FUCK-COMMUNISM 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no evidence? Where did Tucker look?

1
AngryAsian 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about 800 signed affidavits ya doomer retard.

1
Chuckwagon642000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tucker needs to grow a spine, quit on air live citing the election fraud, media cover up, and Foxs spearheading the Nov 3 coup attempt.

1
top_eagle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stfu about Fox.

-2
MostEffectualTopKek -2 points ago +5 / -7

Fair assessment.

We've spent 4 years being blue-balled. It's now too late to trust the plan 4d bullshit.

I'm concerned that the only evidence they have is what they have been putting out there.

Circumstantial. Statistical and a whistle-blower from Venzuela.

Now the server raid ... if Sidney is saying they don't know who got it, we have to hope she is misdirection, otherwise without hard evidence ... it won't hold up.

1
Anaconda 1 point ago +5 / -4

That venezuela one is laughable if that is actually a "smoking gun".

I hope they have more

0
bobjones123 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yeah, I thought they were joking when they said that.

I have a moderate concern that the legal representation they have, doesn't have the skills to expose the fraud.

1
Anaconda 1 point ago +4 / -3

Yup. I am with you brother. The problem is all the talented Bush v gore lawyers are swamp monsters and refuse to help the POTUS. I hope they do a good job though. Fingers crossed.

I think the plan is to completely destroy the electoral votes via legislatures so it is a contested election. Already blocking it at the county level. Nobody here expected that to happen. Was crazy in GA and MI when they did that. That was like the first chink in the RINO armor.

1
RodRod 1 point ago +1 / -0

They made 8 affidavits public - out of several hundred. So no, that's not the only evidence they have.