They have presented no evidence. They have made an opening statement about the evidence they plan to present. They have presented no evidence yet. It's not time. That's all Tucker said. They have presented no evidence yet. When they present evidence let's see what all the other 'journalists' do. I think that may be the point he is making. Will they be as impartial about the evidence presented as he is about their being none now??
Comments (58)
sorted by:
They presented some affidavits publicly, which is evidence. Stop running the ball for Tucker. If he would take that must abs use it to dig himself, he'd get more. Statistical impossibility also exists and is evidence and could be reviewed. Evidence was presented and is available. Following that trail would be real journalism. He wants to have them do it for him, which would breach their ethics.