3854
Comments (212)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
Truly_anonymous1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Socializing profits would be actually beneficial. What the cronies are doing is socializing COSTS and privatizing PROFITS.

0
Faffz 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why shouldn't profits be privatized? Why should someone who wasn't able to accept any risk share in the reward? I have a lot of money in my 401k and I've taken risks. Why should someone who has saved nothing receive some of those profits? And if people who save and invest nothing get the profits, why would people ever save and invest? How would businesses raise capital?

1
Truly_anonymous1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Learn what crony capitalism is and learn reading comprehension. They are SOCIALIZING COSTS with the taxpayers money but keeping profits. The risk in on the taxpayers but they keep all the profit. NOT COOL. If you disagree you are a filthy communist and will be blocked.

Also- your 401 is not a business and does not make profits. And you’re literally making wallstreet brokers rich while assuming all the risk.

0
FThinkum 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol. Wut?

Okay what's your take home pay? Socialize it with me.

-1
Truly_anonymous1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I’m not a crony capitalist you genius. Globalist corporations are ALREADY socialializing their COSTS but keeping all the profits. If they shared the profits it would be beneficial given your above scenario.

Basic reading comprehension.