6853
Comments (204)
sorted by:
206
Kekistaniphil 206 points ago +206 / -0

I dig this reference. I can hear the music 😆

166
Snipthetipandsip 166 points ago +166 / -0

Weren't we already cyber criminals for reading WikiLeaks emails that only CNN had the authority to read? :0

99
davidmode 99 points ago +99 / -0

Its laughable when msm thinks it has any kind of authority over people

41
ProfessionalCourtesy 41 points ago +41 / -0

They have been told it is coming.

Question the MSM under the Biden Bastards and Bitches... you will get arrested and questioned in a little room, while chained to a table.

Ask for a lawyer and they will beat you harder and put a gun in your mouth.

Ask any Jew that survived Nazi Germany.

30
mumblenuggets 30 points ago +32 / -2

What the Nazis did to Jews, Democrats will do to us.

Count on it.

23
TalmudIsToiletPaper 23 points ago +24 / -1

Let's reframe: What the Communists did to their victims, and are still doing to their victims, they will also do to us.

Always remember that the Nazis were chump amateurs in comparison to the kill counts, and horror shows of all Communist Systems. The numbers don't lie.

As we're fighting against literal Communists, our messaging must be clear.

13
synd1050 13 points ago +14 / -1

I want us to do this.i don’t know why every comparison must be to the Nazis even when the events are dissimilar.these are communists we are facing and everyone knows the face behind communism.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
tentonbudgie 7 points ago +8 / -1

I wonder if there's some kind of vested interest in keeping Nazis the worst war criminals of all time.

8
10
mumblenuggets 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yep. We have yet to grasp how evil Democrats have become.

But we are about to learn.

2
Anime_titty_expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have you seen the police interrogations in China? It's gonna be exactly like that

10
TheRedPlanet 10 points ago +10 / -0

It isn't laughable, the problem is that they dominate the culture and they are sowing the seeds of poison by saying these things. Over time these ideas are accepted as mainstream. We need to stop laughing, they are deadly serious in their ideas.

3
davidmode 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fair point

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
Veracious_deplorable 9 points ago +9 / -0

But for some reason they believe it like a religion. Ask any MSM journalist, they’ll tell ya rights were out there for them, not you.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
Rreidy8286 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep and what we are seeing is them realising that they have lost the little power they once had. They will always have a grip on the weaker minds but im seeing even normies rail against them. Even my dad (former tds sufferer) was pissed on election night about how openly they're motives appeared. He said the last straw was when cuckvuto cut away from the maga valkyrie saying " how dare fox think they can decide for me what i should see"

Then he said he couldn't get this question out of his head after that " what else have they kept from me, what else did they decide was to complex for me to make up my own mind?"

Then he went and dug for himself for a few days and called me up and i was shocked by how angry he was. He isnt the type to get angry easily but he was pissed about all the information these "news" agencies have kept hidden from him.

Pedes if it got through to him a terminal tds sufferer i think there are millions more that were red pilled because of this and im starting to think that was part of the chess game.

2
McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

Glad to hear your dad's recovered from TDS! If he keeps digging, he might even decide to become a pede.

23
x79q3pb 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's different for the media... <.<

10
Cyber_Criminal 10 points ago +10 / -0

Some of us at least.

5
chaletschuss3467 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hahaha I forgot about that 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

5
Sherlocks_Pocket 5 points ago +5 / -0

This needs it’s own post :-)

34
Italians_Invented_2A 34 points ago +34 / -0

I always thought at "you wouldn't download a car?"

Fuck you! I would if I could!

20
stjimmy92 20 points ago +20 / -0

In the days of 3D printing, you may be able to! *some assembly required

11
Beegie 11 points ago +11 / -0

Does this work for sex robots too?

Asking for a friend.

9
ProfessionalCourtesy 9 points ago +9 / -0

The durometer of 3D printing materials, like TPU is still too rigid for that kind of thing at the moment. The armatures could be made of PLA or PETG with ABS for some of the more stressed components.

Go to Amazon and type in : 3D Printer

There are quite a few for under $300. Look for videos about them on YouTube and have a blast learning a new skill.

Some of the plastic feet for our high end gas range grids pop out while in the dishwasher and we printed some oversized ones from TPU and now they stay put and are better than the originals.

The issue is the cast iron casting holes were not sized after manufacture and some in the grids are oversized compared to others. Buying new feet meant the same thing happened over and over, feet lost to the sink or under the range when removed to clean the grids.

With the somewhat squishy TPU 3D filament, feet attachment shafts could be made slightly larger in diameter for the half dozen factory defective oversized casting holes.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not fucking a sexbot with cast iron holes.

2
ProfessionalCourtesy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bender! I thought you were building your own place, with blackjack and hookers!

9
spaceman00 9 points ago +9 / -0

Piracy is equivalent of someone that brought an item (or got an clone of it) cloning this item and giving to people. Many would do it.

Actually people DO IT, when people are childrens they believe at santa claus and when santa give them a copyrighted toy, thats exactly what hypothetical santa do, and childrens are ok with that.

8
Italians_Invented_2A 8 points ago +11 / -3

If I steal your bike, you don't have a bike anymore.

If you voluntarily share your bike with me, we both have a bike.

Piracy laws are illegitimate. The taxpayer money should not be used to prevent people from enjoy a work of art.

Only things that should be protected by laws are actual inventions, like drugs. Not a fucking song or a fucking cartoon mouse.

6
ProfessionalCourtesy 6 points ago +7 / -1

Without patent laws, innovation would come to a stop.

Why? Inventions/research would cease to gain funding.

7
Italians_Invented_2A 7 points ago +8 / -1

Have you read my post?

A movie or a song or a cartoon mouse is not innovation.

1
ProfessionalCourtesy 1 point ago +4 / -3

How is Avatar not innovative?

2
thedaynos 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't believe that's true. There's always room for innovation. If I can invent something and someone buys it, then we both win. I think the major change, if we got rid of patent laws, would be that whoever invented the item would need to be paid BIGLY instead of via royalties.

1
ProfessionalCourtesy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without patent laws the big boys would devour any and all start-ups without have to compete or buy them out to gain their intellectual property.

When they offer to buy you out, you negotiate a good price, take it as capitalization on the next product line/invention. The American way, not taught in Econ 101.

1
thedaynos 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disagree. Look at this site, it's a direct ripoff of reddit. td.win is not a "big boy".

2
Frogleg3 2 points ago +2 / -0

i invent all the time and release them.

most software that runs the internet is volutarily written and legally open sourced in a share license.

its is a myth most of humanity would stop contributing if not legally bound to payment.

people just want the basics and then most people beyond that are happy to freely give and share of anything that doesnt materially cost them raw materials to give.

0
ProfessionalCourtesy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is English your second language?

2
deleted 2 points ago +8 / -6 (edited)
6
Italians_Invented_2A 6 points ago +7 / -1

You're causing a sale to be lost, which is in fact stealing.

This is wrong. Publishers calculate their loss with the assumption that every single pirated copy would have been a sale if piracy didn't exist.

That's wrong. Most people, if they couldn't pirate, would simply not consume the product. You think every kid with a pirated copy of Photoshop would spend $1000 for it? No, they'd just switch to an open source software. Same for Windows. People would use Linux instead.

it's about property rights and exclusive right to monetize said property. What you're describing is literally communism; the people are able to utilize your property without your consent.

No. If I buy a CD with a videogame on it, I should be able to do what I want with it. Including giving it to all my friends just like I can let all my friends use my bike. Piracy doesn't mean I break into your house to take your stuff. It simply means I share the stuff that is my property.

Take Mickey Mouse again. I'm not stealing property from anyone; I'm just drawing with my own pen in my own paper a cartoon character that looks like Walt Disney's. Why the hell should I not be allowed to do that?

I wouldn't attempt to rationalize it by acting like I'm not hurting the company and creators that I'm stealing from.

That's not my moral justification. My moral justification is that someone should not be able to make money by writing a song. A singer can make money by performing live. Not by claiming that a certain combination of notes is their exclusive usage!

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

they received the benefit of the product without paying, that is stealing

Even if you use my car, with my permission, you are receiving the benefits of the product without paying. It's not stealing.

so long as access to that property is lost when transferred. You can share your bike with your friend, but you can't both use it at the same time

I can share my car with any number of people. Some people engage in book exchange: the same book gets passed on from person to person. Even in public: there are public places where you can leave a book and get one for free. So the same book can be enjoyed by thousands of people over many years, unknown to the original purchaser.

What difference does it make it it's not at the same time?

When you duplicate it, you are in fact stealing

This is simply wrong even from a legal perspective. The law does allow me to duplicate a song, for the purpose of backup or of putting it in a different medium. If I buy a CD I can certainly put it in a cassette to listen in a cassette recorder. What you're not allowed to do is to share it with others.

To your third point, you are literally espousing communist philosophy. The product of your labor, whether it be tangible like a machine, or intangible like a song, is yours and yours alone. Writing a song does not require zero effort, and you have no right to use someone's song just because you want to. The original writer gets to decide that, not you. I'm actually shocked that you support communism, and apparently don't even realize that you're doing it.

Not everything that is invented is private property. The law decides what is and what isn't, and this is an arbitrary distinction. This distinction is based on the greater good of society, which is not just a communist concept.

If you invent a new biodrug: yes, there should be a patent. But not everything you invent should be protected by the law.

For instance what you post on here is not protected by copyright. You might argue that it took some effort for you to write your comment. But you can't stop other people from copy pasting it and using your words in other discussions.

Where do you draw the line? Dr Evil claims that his father invented the question mark. Should someone be able to copyright a sentence, a phrase, a saying? A meme?

My best example is chess. Every chess player studies what other masters did and invented. They literally call it "a novelty" when a grandmaster invents a new concept, which is presented as a set of moves. Everyone then starts playing that, literally copying the master who invented it - and even for profit in official tournaments. The master who invented it gets fame, in fact every one of the hundreds of named variations is named after the person who discovered it. They can even write a book to explain it.

But they certainly don't get money when someone plays it! In fact, every serious chess player knows dozens of famous games by heart and they just copy them (up to a certain point) when they are in a tournament.

And it takes lots of effort to invent a new variation, arguably much more than for writing a song. But that doesn't matter because it's not the author that decides. It's society that decides what is protected or not, and for how long.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cuckold.

1
spaceman00 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you voluntarily share your bike with me, we both have a bike.

Piracy is cloning the bike and giveing it to you.

4
Kraken_V_Algorithm 4 points ago +4 / -0

So you're saying piracy is what they actually did with votes for Biden?

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. It was "you wouldn't STEAL a car". Somehow the internet in it's vast stupidity rewrote the ad in their imagination.

17
lo_there 17 points ago +17 / -0

what's really funny is this ad and the creators got sued for copyright infringement because they didn't get permission to use that song in the video.

11
TheWatcherWhoWatches 11 points ago +11 / -0

The funny thing about those bloody 'adverts' was that they forced me to archive all my DVD's to a NAS drive just so I could get rid of them - technically making me a criminal :)

(I keep the originals, but if you lose one - how do you prove it)

9
Donald_Gear_Solid 9 points ago +9 / -0

Me watching this warning in VLC player for my movie with Chinese subs at the bottom.

103
Meddlesom 103 points ago +103 / -0

Fuck you! I'd download a car if I could!

48
kag-2020- 48 points ago +48 / -0

"You wouldn't download a house."

Yea I would! Build that technology and I'll have more beachside houses than Bernie!

8
ChokingOnARedpill 8 points ago +8 / -0

Summer camps.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Hektik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Recreational Slave Labor Camps...for the homeless!

2
spezisapedo 2 points ago +2 / -0

PUT IT IN YOUR OWN ASS, ASSHOLE

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

It never said "you wouldn't download a car", btw.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
88
Shakakka99 88 points ago +90 / -2

Know what's not open source? The nefarious software we're supposed to magically trust that determines who gets to be the leader of the free world.

31
BigFreedomBoner 31 points ago +32 / -1

Any politician that voted to install a voting system that contained an algorithm should be hanged by the neck until dead.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
9
SmoothCyberCriminal 9 points ago +10 / -1

Bruh we’re all hackrz now. It just became accessible

7
Shakakka99 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fuck. I just downloaded the entire unix compendium into my cortex.

5
SmoothCyberCriminal 5 points ago +5 / -0

From hence forth you shall be called “the cyber criminal known as DOTwin Chan”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
48
P0keu 48 points ago +48 / -0

I like being a cyber criminal! Always have!

Glad to have TD as my home.

38
atomisten 38 points ago +38 / -0 (edited)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQllunHssEk

it's illegal to possess these stolen documents... so everything you learn, you learn it from US in CNN

funny how same thing applies today as with wiki. they want to control the narrative.

9
LiberalismIsTheVirus 9 points ago +9 / -0

But dried Ramen man knows more than them

3
ManOnTheEdge 3 points ago +3 / -0

based noodle cruncher

35
Jarsyl 35 points ago +35 / -0

Cybercriminal (noun): A person group of persons who take down the largest deep state voter fraud of all time with an Excel spreadsheet.

Cybercriminal (adj): A term used to describe a group of autists on the internet when you’re losing.

29
ThirstyLibertyTree 29 points ago +29 / -0

You wouldn’t see blatant voter fraud at a polling location and sign a sworn affidavit about it, would you?

You wouldn’t vote to not certify an election result that was a mathematical impossibility, would you?

27
grayfox878 27 points ago +27 / -0

That meme is gold!

25
Vince_Fosters_Shoe 25 points ago +26 / -1

It's a good thing most of us live in Russia!

19
Dashmoomoo 19 points ago +20 / -1

Greetings, comrade. It's has been warmed up into -27*C. Glorious DAY.

10
MikesBigJockstrap 10 points ago +10 / -0

Beep boop. Cyka cyka. Russian bot reporting comrade.

11
Dashmoomoo 11 points ago +11 / -0

Da !

5
YYZeh 5 points ago +5 / -0

VODKA

3
Dashmoomoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

BEER!

2
litux 2 points ago +2 / -0

Per Russian law, beer is a soft drink.

3
SpookySpooky 3 points ago +3 / -0

BLYAT

RED BEAR, RED BEAR, AK47

hard bass on in background

23
FoxsCyberCriminal 23 points ago +23 / -0

I’m very bad. It’s only legal if the media does it.

5
SmoothCyberCriminal 5 points ago +5 / -0

How do you do fellow cyber criminal?

19
deleted 19 points ago +21 / -2
11
PresElectKekPede 11 points ago +13 / -2

Data is racist, graphs are racist. Get with it, bigot.

8
salty_eight 8 points ago +9 / -1

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1tjjH011kSYp/ Apparently, in Germany, it is.

5
ThePowerOfPrayer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now we know why they kept the server in Frankfurt, Germany.

taps forehead

3
Dashmoomoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dropped algebra 2 in HS. So idk... 🤦‍♂️

17
Burchoid 17 points ago +19 / -2

How dare you do something completely benign!

16
Bullet3250 16 points ago +16 / -0

PEDES HERE "PURCHASED" VOTING DATA FROM STATE SOURCES WHO ACTUALLY ARE SELLING THE DATA.... SOMETIMES FOR VERY LARGE SUMS OF MONEY....

DID FOX NEWS BUY THE DATA TOO?

3
xxxMAGA420xxx 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why would Fox News buy the data, they can make up what ever shit they want for free.

15
hailXenu 15 points ago +15 / -0

The plot was to plot...

Devious!

15
SeleniteGrayAMG 15 points ago +15 / -0

PII: Pede Identifiable Information

13
stormcloud 13 points ago +14 / -1

Among the many other things I've been accused of being, I can now add "cybercriminal" to the list. So much more interesting than my actual reality, this is all so very flattering. I think I'll start putting these on my CV....English teacher...4H volunteer....Cybercriminal (perhaps "smooth cybercriminal")...

7
LadyOfLorien 7 points ago +8 / -1

Don't forget to add that you're also the hacker known as "4Chan"

5
stormcloud 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah, I'm not that -- too old. I'm fine with the more mundane (but still far more intriguing than reality) "cybercriminal". I think I need to go out and buy a trenchcoat, some gold rimmed aviators, a really bitchin' hat.

3
LadyOfLorien 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe some of those cool LED gloves too. Go full cyberpunk.

2
ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gold rimmed aviators? Never go full Joe Biden.

2
stormcloud 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Nah, he wears silver rimmed ones -- very common, very disrespectful.

In fact, one could say that he has appropriated, plagiarized, the look.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
stormcloud 1 point ago +1 / -0

Henceforth they shall be known as "Big Guy" glasses.

-1
SupremeDearLeader2 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Stormcloud are you ok, are you ok, are you ok Stormcloud are you ok

Hee hee

9
Isolated_Patriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

Did anyone ANYONE ever see this commercial and not immediately think: "Yes I would."

One of the dumbest 'public service' campaigns ever.

7
GEOTUSMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Taxpayer money well spent.

8
Malfunction 8 points ago +8 / -0

The left: How dare you share your $25,000 purchase with others!

Also the left: We demand socialism where everything is shared as public property.

2
TypicalEd 2 points ago +3 / -1

Wow, some pedes here are dedicted to spend that on the data. I think this data is being sold to large companies. They never thought pedes would buy it.

Can they track who bought it and distributed it here?

-1
Trump_in_2020_Pedes -1 points ago +1 / -2

dedicted?

7
Racerx719 7 points ago +7 / -0

I realized we are close to winning when my in laws had today show on this morning and the cunt Savannah Guthrie was asking an “expert” if the Biden team can peruse legal action to force a transition

7
thoughtcriminal 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’s exactly what a cyber criminal would say

7
now_look_here 7 points ago +7 / -0

We have gone past ignore and mock, now in the fight stage. Next up: we win!

5
GayPedesAnonymous 5 points ago +5 / -0

You know you’re about to win when suddenly every blue governor has jumped headfirst back into covid hysteria and lockdowns 🤪

5
ProfessionalCourtesy 5 points ago +5 / -0

All it does is show that the Biden Bastards and Bitches are plan to implement the Chinese Communist style of governance.

Quasi-Capitalist with draconian limits on personal liberty. A police State.

5
BrownRugs 5 points ago +5 / -0

You wouldn’t download a presidency, would you?!

4
BumpForTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Admin should sue Fox. Slander

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
OlafRustle 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the movie trailer voice: "In a world of lies, truth is a crime. But one forum on the internet is ready to do the deed..."

4
jamesvien1011 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wasn't the data available publicly to buy?

4
IAmNotAnAutist 4 points ago +6 / -2

Hitler was a cyber criminal too.

4
Gooseontheloose 4 points ago +4 / -0

Alan Turing was the first hacker.

3
Summonblood 3 points ago +3 / -0

The irony of the left thinking they were cool because they opposed the mainstream and then becoming the mainstream.

3
Ragnar_Danneskjold 3 points ago +3 / -0

You wouldn't shoot an Antifag and then steal his face mask. You wouldn't go to the toilet in his face mask, and then send it to the Antifag's grieving top, and then steal it again.

3
axrevolutionai 3 points ago +3 / -0

They would make this info private if they could.

It's soooo convenient that HIPPA laws Makes it impossible for us to call hospitals ourselves and get the real numbers and patient data..which means they get to lie to us outright about covid and fear monger

3
mehemson 3 points ago +3 / -0

I personally prefer the title "cyber bully" yep, i do love handing out digital Indian burns, and cyber swirlies!

3
Everight 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need CNN journos supervision, only they are legally allowed to look at data.

3
Lone_Pine_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spicy

2
AllTheWayTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I expect the FBI will be at all of our doors very soon. This kind of "investigation" is right up their alley. I can't imagine them being very busy at the moment with much.

2
hestkorv 2 points ago +2 / -0

They call us cybercriminals because of the next pandemic, the "Cyber pandemic". https://cyberpolygon.com/results-2020/

2
Bappi 2 points ago +2 / -0

No only CNN has the authority to do that! Don’t worry I’m sure they’ll take the time to download the voter data and report it back to the American people accurately! /s

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Spawnlingman 2 points ago +3 / -1

Honestly. We probably have a legally binding class action lawsuit against them for saying that.

Wanna play their game with them?

2
misterLahey 2 points ago +2 / -0

You'll pry my ggplot out of my cold, dead hands.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
misterLahey 2 points ago +2 / -0

It has its quirks. I use ggplot2, to be precise. R.

2
PlateOwner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whoever made the accusation is a hack.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Hillary-Digs-a-Hole 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Cyber is an adverb they are using to make them sound sloothy. They called us "criminals". Criminals for thinking differently than their motherly myths to save us from corruption.

I will swim after I eat no matter what Fox says.

2
CrankyCrab 2 points ago +2 / -0

Badge of Honor. Media is so compromised that they forgot what real journalism is. Thank you TD keyboard warriors for all your work!

2
LirukDatan 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's criminal to have independent thought! REEEEEEE!!!

Only thoughts approved by your overlords CNN are allowed!

2
Unbent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Flak Status: Over the target

2
Maxberg 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why the Third Reich history should be mandatory, along with teaching things like animal farm.

I know polish people who said the concentration camps were mandatory part of school.

I've been to one three times in germany.... People that lived on the outskirts of these camps claimed they didn't know what was going on... Those are the fence sitters.

I'll die for freedom before I have to live with no freedom.

2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn't it just one month ago someone created donaldtrump.watch which listed the name and address of every single person who donated to Trump?

"It's all public info" they were screaming on Twitter when people were trying to report the link/hashtag for doxxing.

After someone threatened to sue them they hastily rebranded to donor.watch and now offer information supposedly from both sides.

1
grenades_and_ham 1 point ago +1 / -0

CNN has to clear it first!