FFS. Trumps recount team has the server. They started to analyze the data, and the guy said what he saw at that time would destroy the globalists - whatever that means.
Source is an interview on NewsMax Nov 18. How many times does that have to be posted?
Are you talking about the Brian Trascher interview? His title in the interview is "surrogate". Technically, you and I are Trump surrogates. Do you have anything that would give me a better reason to believe he's close to those in the know or is it just someone that got on Newsmax echo'ing the narratives that are brewing here on TD?
"Trump Recount Committee staffer tells Newsmax the server raid was real and raw data showed different".
The video content and the title of the article describe him as a member of the Trump Recount Committee. And yet, you focus on the word "surrogate" in the chyron... how about you just fuck off.
So investmentwatchblog gave him a title. Must be true.
Do you have anything that physically puts him in the Trump Recount Committee other than an article that seems to be ripped from infowars? Or are we just blindly believing everything we read on the internet?
I can prove to you definitively that he's a lobbyist. Can you prove definitively he's part of the Recount Committee other than dropping a link and saying "they said so"?
Also, are you okay? You seem like you're mad about something.
Agreed, Trust no news outlet. Verify everything.
If it sounds too good to be true, it likely is, unless it can be confirmed.
"Surrogate" just reminds me of "Anonymous Sources" and "People familiar with the subjects thinking"
FFS. Trumps recount team has the server. They started to analyze the data, and the guy said what he saw at that time would destroy the globalists - whatever that means.
Source is an interview on NewsMax Nov 18. How many times does that have to be posted?
Are you talking about the Brian Trascher interview? His title in the interview is "surrogate". Technically, you and I are Trump surrogates. Do you have anything that would give me a better reason to believe he's close to those in the know or is it just someone that got on Newsmax echo'ing the narratives that are brewing here on TD?
(https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/trump-recount-committee-staffer-tells-newsmax-the-server-raid-was-real-and-raw-data-showed-different/)
"Trump Recount Committee staffer tells Newsmax the server raid was real and raw data showed different".
The video content and the title of the article describe him as a member of the Trump Recount Committee. And yet, you focus on the word "surrogate" in the chyron... how about you just fuck off.
So investmentwatchblog gave him a title. Must be true.
Do you have anything that physically puts him in the Trump Recount Committee other than an article that seems to be ripped from infowars? Or are we just blindly believing everything we read on the internet?
I can prove to you definitively that he's a lobbyist. Can you prove definitively he's part of the Recount Committee other than dropping a link and saying "they said so"?
Also, are you okay? You seem like you're mad about something.
Nope, just have a low tolerance for stupidity these days...
Agreed, Trust no news outlet. Verify everything. If it sounds too good to be true, it likely is, unless it can be confirmed. "Surrogate" just reminds me of "Anonymous Sources" and "People familiar with the subjects thinking"
Name checks out...
Choose Hope! Choose Sope! Chews oap! Chew Soap!
Okie Doke?