I can’t decide if the speaker saying “it’s not gonna change the result” means they’re surrendering to cuckoldry or there’s no saving the state from failing to certify.
I dunno. The party line has been “no fraud” and then “no widespread fraud” .... and the next step is “not enough fraud to sway the election” ... but “ok I guess we’ll certify despite our obvious misgivings” doesn’t sound right.
Like, I hope his tone was one of irritation at not anticipating a fight, and finding one. But I’m a romantic..
I can’t decide if the speaker saying “it’s not gonna change the result” means they’re surrendering to cuckoldry or there’s no saving the state from failing to certify.
That sounds like a surrender
I dunno. The party line has been “no fraud” and then “no widespread fraud” .... and the next step is “not enough fraud to sway the election” ... but “ok I guess we’ll certify despite our obvious misgivings” doesn’t sound right.
Like, I hope his tone was one of irritation at not anticipating a fight, and finding one. But I’m a romantic..