I am a lawyer myself, and I have to admit that Rudy is very persuasive in how he presents this material. It’s a very difficult thing to do. He’s talented AF.
Lefties have said he shit the bed the other day in his PA federal court argument, but I bet they are wrong or don’t know what’s going on in the case. I didn’t hear it, only part of the defense’s presentation. Anyone have a link?
I can’t imagine how hard the lawyers and staff are working on these cases. I’m sure all-nighters are being pulled. The cases are going to be huge. I hope they aren’t burning out.
Attorney here also. I'm worried about their burnout but these cats seem like straight shooters. I listen to Mr. Giuliani speak and he's so refined but simplistic. Knowledge yet relaxed. It's a rare gift in this field because so many are just simply seeking to sound fanciful or make inside references they know certain judges adhere to. Or they're just straight up corrupt, which is always troubling when you've got the winning argument.
Not to ramble but whenever I hear the disrespect towards Mr. Giuliani I get so aggravated because tl hear this man's advice and arguments would literally costs thousands in school and that's only IF he himself taught. We learn about Mr. Giuliani in school because he's so fucking smart. Now to hear his name being tossed around like garbage boils my blood.
I asked OP, but I am asking you as well, because you are an attorney.
How do you feel about Tucker's criticism of Sidney? Do you think it was fair or uncalled for?
Also, do you think Sidney has strong evidence for what she is claiming?
To me, it comes down to faith. I have faith in Sydney Powell because they've had to throw everything they've got at her, again in my opinion. I can be sure to tell you that many like myself are watching the last attempts to use the legal system in a matter that can preserve itself. We yet to know the outcome.
I think Tucker has proven time and time again not to be trusted. It's clearer now more than ever that people in power can use the media to scope out evidence. Tucker tried and failed and cried on national television and lied about it. Again, I believe Sydney Powell. You don't do everything someone like her has done just to throw it away on 4chan trolls. No. This reckoning has needed to take place for a while. It's like Fat Celemenza tells Michael Coreleone before his assassination starts a war, "dees tings happen Mikey, they get out the bad blood."
Thanks pede!
It's fucking Rudy Guiliani... the mans credibility is absolutely indisputable and a man of his impeccable character and career does not take up "loser cases" especially if it could cost him his life.
Rudy is the Ben Franklin of the second American revolution.
After Trump, is there room for one more on Rushmore??
You could definitely make a strong case for it. He’s already an American Hero and legend based on his performance during 9/11 alone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buQCdCSDWQQ&app=desktop&ab_channel=RightSideBroadcastingNetwork
Not a lawyer, but the one tell-tale sign that he's got a winning hand is that all the media has to report on is him wiping hair dye off his forehead.
Since you are a lawyer, I do have a question for you.
How do you feel about Tucker's criticism of Sidney? Do you think it was fair or uncalled for?
Also, do you think Sidney has strong evidence for what she is claiming?