It's not impossible though. However when there are so many signs that would indicate Trump is going to win, and they are desperate to not look into anything, or do basic integrity measures, it is not going to sit well with people who are honest with themselves and care about integrity more then naked power grabs. When it’s the side that wanted to investigate Trump for 4 yrs over ridiculous claims of being a Russian spy, but they don’t want to spend a few weeks to even wait for court cases to play out here, it just makes it more obscene.
Just like it is not “impossible” that all the atoms in your chair “happen” to all move in the same direction at the same moment and lift you right off the ground.
But in the real world, we would be pretty comfortable saying such a thing is impossible. Just like all the bellwether counties being wrong. They weren’t wrong.
Don't get me wrong, I certainly don't think biden won, and I will never believe there was not fraud (largescale fraud, there will never be any election ever with absolutely 0 fraud) in this election no matter what anyone says, short of Trump coming out and saying it was all a scam and I lied, or if it was somehow proven all the evidence we are looking at here daily was all faked. Especially when you add other evidence like biden doing worse than even hillary most places other then absolutely critical cities that he had to win, the fact no one liked him and he only got out of their own primaries through shady means, the turnout numbers being so high that they are unbelieveable etc. I agree it is functionally impossible that he actually won. However if you have some guy analyzing stats, and he claims that since bellwethers went for Trump so that means it is impossible that he lost, that is just simply not true and can be used to discredit, hence why I think the "improbable", or "extremely improbable" is the correct term.
It's not impossible though. However when there are so many signs that would indicate Trump is going to win, and they are desperate to not look into anything, or do basic integrity measures, it is not going to sit well with people who are honest with themselves and care about integrity more then naked power grabs. When it’s the side that wanted to investigate Trump for 4 yrs over ridiculous claims of being a Russian spy, but they don’t want to spend a few weeks to even wait for court cases to play out here, it just makes it more obscene.
Just like it is not “impossible” that all the atoms in your chair “happen” to all move in the same direction at the same moment and lift you right off the ground.
But in the real world, we would be pretty comfortable saying such a thing is impossible. Just like all the bellwether counties being wrong. They weren’t wrong.
You just defined improbable!
Don't get me wrong, I certainly don't think biden won, and I will never believe there was not fraud (largescale fraud, there will never be any election ever with absolutely 0 fraud) in this election no matter what anyone says, short of Trump coming out and saying it was all a scam and I lied, or if it was somehow proven all the evidence we are looking at here daily was all faked. Especially when you add other evidence like biden doing worse than even hillary most places other then absolutely critical cities that he had to win, the fact no one liked him and he only got out of their own primaries through shady means, the turnout numbers being so high that they are unbelieveable etc. I agree it is functionally impossible that he actually won. However if you have some guy analyzing stats, and he claims that since bellwethers went for Trump so that means it is impossible that he lost, that is just simply not true and can be used to discredit, hence why I think the "improbable", or "extremely improbable" is the correct term.
What you have concluded is that it is implausible. On this point I agree. Manipulated input is a much more plausible statistical probability.