582
Comments (31)
sorted by:
22
Alpha_Lemming 22 points ago +22 / -0

In a vote counting machine, the concept of fractions should not even be involved.

Any line of code with decimals is suspect, as the machine should be dealing with integers and addition functions only.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Error404 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's just plain rAcIsT

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
antimatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Only time decimals and division or multiplication should be used are in voter turnout reports. It would be amazing if the code got leaked for the Scytle servers. I hope the git repository was on em.

11
Hugh 11 points ago +11 / -0

Always lie to pollsters. Their terrible polls were the reason their multipliers were so far off.

3
chopz 3 points ago +3 / -0

YES!!!!

5
Wazhazee 5 points ago +5 / -0

I applied the above algorithms to Virginia in this post from yesterday: https://thedonald.win/p/11QRfYrDj4/what-she-said-and-what-i-heard/

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Zskills 4 points ago +4 / -0

This would actually be a legit feature for ranked-choice voting.

the problem is that the US doesn't use ranked-choice voting in general elections, and it appears that instead of allocating the % to candidates by rank, they did it strictly according to which candidate was voted for.

3
Fozibare 3 points ago +3 / -0

They weighted Trump voters as 3/5 of a Biden voter. What the anti-constitutional fuck?

3
WillWorkFor556 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but circumstantially, this proves someone maliciously programmed this and exhibited the social justice brainwashing.

2
Brundlefly78 2 points ago +2 / -0

10% for the big guy

2
4022a 2 points ago +2 / -0

So they paused, tweaked the algorithm, then kept going, but something went wrong and it generated spikes.

2
anonaustirol 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like unorganized crime, also known as "communism".

-5
iamherefortheluls -5 points ago +3 / -8

i think people are overhyping Dominion impact.

Georgia just finished a hand recount and did not find a mismatch of the 65+ thousands that was supposed to have been changed by Dominion according to original 'bomb' thread on here.

I worry this Dominion story is obfuscating real fraud of falsified ballots

10
TerpenoidTester 10 points ago +10 / -0

Using the Georgia hand recount as an example of anything is a bad idea.

2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +3 / -1

you think they sneaked 65000 paper ballots by the monitors?

Which they made after the election?

to cover exactly for the numbers that dominion faked?

2
hansgruber7 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes. could have been made before the election. what monitors?

0
iamherefortheluls 0 points ago +1 / -1

we didn't get nearly enough to be confident, but we did have some people watching that recount.

2
hansgruber7 2 points ago +2 / -0

not enough to be confident at all and there was no signature review or any sort of audit of fraudulent ballots. There was no effective or comprehensive review of all the fraudulent mail in ballots. There are sworn affidavits of people seeing large numbers of pristine ballots with no creases with no perfectly filled in circles only for Biden.

Also, the rejection rate for mail in ballots was less than ten percent what it was in previous elections, despite a massive increase in mail in ballots. Total fraud.

1
iamherefortheluls 1 point ago +1 / -0

i am well aware the Georgia soc and press are lying about conducting an audit, when in fact all they did was a recount.

My point is that even accounting for fraudulent ballots, the recount should have caught the Dominion counting machines vote switch.

other commenters here presented the theory that the bad guys used the time between election and recount to sneak in more paper ballots to match the altered counts, and I don't deny that possibility but it's a bigger reach for me.

That private audit done by Voter Integrity Project is in my opinion far more provable and solid piece of evidence and it should be sufficient to invalidate results in several states.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't think it would have been that hard for them to supply the fraudulent ballots to match the altered counts, even in the days it took to complete the initial count.

2
TerpenoidTester 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think if I wanted to fix a car I wouldn't look at a broken car to figure out what to fix.

2
chopz 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're not accounting for what the machine algorithm was doing. You need to understand that better. In real time, for all of election day, algorithm was taking Trump votes by fractions and giving them to Biden in perfect swaps of total votes. During the entire day. The ballot dumps were to catch up the vote totals quickly when the algorithm fell behind by too great a margin.

2
chopz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, it's very easy to sneak 65k ballots through when you have kicked every objectionable "monitor" out of the building. They brought a lot more than that in. They didn't count on some democrats being sickened enough to testify.

0
iamherefortheluls 0 points ago +1 / -1

but that's exact kind of discrepancy that would than come out in a hand count of the paper ballots - there would be not enough papers with biden votes and too many with trump.

They would have to sneak in exactly the right amount of biden votes to conform with the results sent out by the machines, and take out exactly the right number of votes for Trump.

2
chopz 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what they attempted to do. That is why they need audits in every state. They over shot their totals by a fuckload which is how all of this became so obvious.

7
Chick-fill-eh 7 points ago +7 / -0

You're only using half the story. It keeps record of number of ballots switched, allowing you to them 'find' a box of ballots with the correct amount to make the counts match.

The issue in GA is that they refused to check the legitimacy of these ballots - they simply counted them all.