posted ago by MiddleFingerResponse
+18 / -0
...if Cucker just got butthurt that she wasn’t giving him the inside scoop so he could break it to the world on his show first. He smeared her in retribution, but it’s kind of blowing up in his face. She had legitimate reason to deny his requests.
...if Cucker just got butthurt that she wasn’t giving him the inside scoop so he could break it to the world on his show first. He smeared her in retribution, but it’s kind of blowing up in his face. She had legitimate reason to deny his requests.
I fail to see a redeeming aspect to such actions.
At best, he's a whiny idiot who should've known better before running his mouth.
At worst, he's a glowie fuckweasel.
He should go back to wearing that bow-tie.
She's trying to protect witnesses, still gives him info, and he throws he under the bus. Tucker is a POS.
Exactly! I’m with you. She straight up said the evidence is an algorithm that malfunctioned due to high influx of opposing votes. She can’t GIVE him the evidence before she’s presented it.
Fox would not embargo any inside information. They do not want to be the "Woodward and Bernstein" of today (which was all crap to begin with). Look at what they did with the Hunter documents. Look what they did not do with the phony Russia hoax or the Ukraine perfect call leading to a political impeachment. The Ryan/Brazille/Murdock daughter-in-law bunch are in control of news. Anchors read from teleprompters.
There have been so many posts about Tucker alternative motives, as to justify his actions.
He's not on our side. Simple.
There are plenty of reporters who are (alternative media). Let's move to them.