https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIlI46HdqKg

Bitchute (still processing): https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lqw0wDQ0kJXy/ https://open.lbry.com/@EdwardKingSolomon:5?r=F4FQsJxBgsLgjc8G7ruAcVj3Loe5eZmQ

rumble (backuped by another pede): https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html

https://open.lbry.com/@EdwardKingSolomon:5?r=F4FQsJxBgsLgjc8G7ruAcVj3Loe5eZmQ

In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.

In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below): https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

EDIT adding this second image for clarification: https://ibb.co/THZf3Hq

A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.

Original data sets: https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6

---

Edit, adding my youtube comment:

"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)."

---

Update:

To repeat this experiment, take any 2020 election dataset with timestamps.

Make a new column, with the array formula (Trump votes divided by Total Votes). Call this Column Z (Ratio Column).

Then sort the spreadsheet by: Column Z (ratio)

Then by: Time Column

then by District/Precinct Column.

It's that easy!

---

Update 2: It's confirmed the Philly uses ES&S voting systems. That being said we should still check for this paradigm in Dominion regions.

---

Update 3 (Sunday, Nov 22) I mapped all of the ratio transfers that occur within ONE TIMESTAMP of each other, no less than 115,343 votes were flipped to 89% Biden. Most of these ratios are chained for the entire week, transferring to a new set of precincts within a single timestamp (within one global update).

Took me all day to figure out how setup a logic board to only identify the most suspicious transfers. When the "timestamp difference" parameter is increased, the amount of cases go up linearly.

For this experiment I kept the timestamp difference at 1, so no false positive would emerge (the logic board on the "mother edited" file is so strict, I most likely negated dozens of actual positives).

All documents included in the go.file link. You can match the "Mother Number" entries from the condensed googlesheet version to the "Mother Sheet" file.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Feu70w7RDoMR1w9rSzq-Yn7hfmQEmv3WfzdnisGNvsk/edit?usp=sharing

https://gofile.io/d/X262uw

---

Update 4

Found a major red flag in one of the ratio transfer timelines, the tabulations actually increase in Precinct 52-05 three times by 14:13:1 in a four hour span.

https://ibb.co/h1k9v52

---

Update 5: Added Live Simulation.

https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes

---

Update 6:

ONE: All of the people claiming to "debunk" my Ratio transfer don't even understand my theory are are purposely misrepresenting it for their agenda.

They THINK (or claim) I'm discussing the repeating precincts, I'm not, precincts naturally repeat until they update. They either don't know this and are stupid and didn't watch the video), or deliberately lying, trying to do a drive analysis to confuse other people who may not have watched the entire video.

Or, they think these are the only ratios in the whole datasheet that that are shared by distinct precincts. No. It's OK if the same ratio is reported by another precinct, so long as the time difference between the reports is either several timestamps (or several hours). In fact most ratios are repeated by different precincts, but at vastly different times.

TWO: Then they claim (the smartest of the dumb, or the smartest of the disinfo agents) that if I remove duplicate entries (from precincts not updating), that the evidence goes away. Yes, and if I bleach a murder scene the evidence also goes away.

It's actually the other way around. The duplicate entries come from dead precincts (that no one is voting at) that the local bosses stuffed harvested ballots. Because of this I can ONLY detect the POSITIVES between dead precincts. I also believe the system prefers these dead low turnout precincts in it's seizure logic.

Thus, I'm sure the system occasionally took live precincts as well, but I can't detect them with my "reverse algorithm" because the difference in time between the live precincts (that were seized) reporting the same ratios can't be differentiated from the legitimate data (most of of the data is clean) and ratios being reported by normal precincts that weren't seized.

THREE: Then the "debunkers" start to play "super stupid" when I catch them in all their bullshit. They start saying "but all the ratios change, look bidens votes changed while trump's stayed the same," meanwhile I'm talking about Trump's votes to total votes, which can be obfuscated by the third party vote. They also deny that in most series of ratios that are transferred that some of the "repeat entries" are actually being updated via a direct injection votes. Although rare, there are at least 200 entries where the "repeat" actually updates with new totals (in the same precinct), and it's the same ratios.

FOUR: Finally you got the "super smart" disinfo agents that link me scatter plots of integer ratios and their intersections. The scatter plots only prove that different precincts will report the same ratios at some point. Yes, that's true, and yes most of the ratios in the datasheet that are shared between precincts are CLEAN and not suspicious, because they are reported at vastly different times. These scatter plot boys fail to add the dimensional component of TIME, and the fourth component of Probability (based on the integer sizes of the numerator and denominator and their prime factorizations).

Although it's possible for ONE precinct with a ratio to stop reporting that ratio and then ANOTHER precinct picks up that ratio within one timestamp, it's INSANE when multiple precincts pick up the same ratio at the SAME TIME and then when they finally stop reporting it, another NEW SET of unique precincts picks up (AT THE SAME TIME), and that pattern of transferred ratios (within one timestamp) between new sets of precincts continuing from November 4th through November 11th.