2211
Comments (47)
sorted by:
55
iron_patriot22 55 points ago +56 / -1

You're right. This needs to be posted on Twitter more, but without thedonal.win link. This place scares normies and they think if they see that shit at the bottom that it's enough to throw everything out.

8
SyNiKaLiTy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fixtd... Here ya go

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
31
leakmouth [S] 31 points ago +31 / -0

HIW CAN ANY STATE EVEN THINK ABOUT CERTIFYING WITH THIS SHIT GOING ON?! So fucking infuriating

13
PNW_PEPE 13 points ago +13 / -0

“It was just a typo!!!! Like everything else!!” REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

7
Itateeverybody 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thats just it though, they will blame it on something stupid like that

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
14
HalfBreedSupremacist 14 points ago +14 / -0

We have the actual numbers. Most states have MANY vote subtractions across all candidates. I can't make sense of it. I have contacted Edison Research about it. Have not heard back. Friend of mine contacted NYT and received no word back.

11
leakmouth [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

No one can explain or make sense of it. Feels like a smoking gun to me

7
HalfBreedSupremacist 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's what I thought. When you plot the percentages that each candidate (Trump, Biden, and 3rd party) received each time there was a vote counts update in a state, you can actually see that votes are being transferred between candidates throughout the count. That's where most of the negatives come from.

9
leakmouth [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

If this doesn’t throw the whole election into question than what will? Why didn’t they bring this up at the press conference and rub it in CNN’s faces?

3
DaddySmooth 3 points ago +3 / -0

In time, Pede. In time. You don't prove your case to the media just like they don't elect a president. It will come out.

6
Hairy_Mouse 6 points ago +10 / -4

I don't think this is that significant. It could have been an error on the display. Not saying it IS, but a banner in fake news isn't a smoking gun.

The raw data is far more important than this. This is easily digestible to normies, though. I don't think it's worth much as far as ACTUAL evidence in court goes.

They could simply make an excuse, like "it was some type of error with the system on our end." They can't really dispute the raw source data.

We also have some amazing, intelligent pedes on here that put data together, which is FAR more compelling than this. Some of the stuff I've seen on this site proves fraud beyond ANY reasonable doubt.

5
DaddySmooth 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't think it's an error since one of the avenues of the data (once a ballot is cast to Dominion) is to send that data directly to the media. I believe Allied Security is the company in Texas that did a video explaining the process including results going to Scytl and back to Dominion in real time. That was one of the first videos to drop the day after the election, and got me started down this rabbit hole. Trump team has that info.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
6
leakmouth [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Facts First: it is not unusual to see Trump’s vote total ackchyually go down by the same amount that Biden gains because orange man is so bad

1
Thewickersnipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe a team of people here have been working on something quite large and impressive that involves this. Unless something changed, it will be out soon. 🍿 😎

3
MAGAskeeter 3 points ago +3 / -0

i was about to ask for an explanation of the time stamp as it looks like it's backwards - but the fine print says it is time until next polls close - so the chronological order is corredt 50:46 is after 51:21 - if you share this, be prepared to be asked about that.

2
leakmouth [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watch the video if you haven’t seen it. Everybody should see it. It should be required viewing . Sidney Powell should be brnging it up constantly

3
wwg1warrior 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well,

CNN said this was not evidence, so shut up. CNN knows what is best for us.

3
Winged_Splinter 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've been posting it everywhere trying to bring attention to it.

3
suckmycorona 3 points ago +3 / -0

But but the media can call the election but pay no mind to the numbers we post. /s

2
not_a_shill 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not a smoking gun cus someone could say "oh CNN data entry into the graphic software that makes the overlay"

Smoking gun would be seeing the database entry recrods and the code from those machines that did the flip.

2
Belleoffreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is evidence. The press is lying about there being no evidence.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because the normies will just say 'it's just the CNN people messing up, they're fake news, right'

1
NeverInterruptEnemy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Devils advocate.... the API feed the networks use isn’t an official source of anything.

This DOES NOT hand wave away the irregularity. Not make excuses that this was a fair election. But... this API data they use for real time isn’t “proof” of anything.

1
NeuroticIntrovert 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's pretty simple, actually. It's a big game of broken telephone.

Precincts report to whomever else at the state level, that gets reported to the public. There's a company called Edison that provides a live election-night feed of this information, collated, via their API.

The trouble is that that Edison feed is intended for exactly what you see - numbers on a news channel during live coverage. Well... they kind of cheaped out a bit.

The format of the data is something like this:

Total votes: 3,941,826

Biden: 56.6 (percent)

Trump: 42.0 (percent).

This makes it a bit smaller, easier to serve, when you have a lot of companies hitting your API repeatedly on election night. I don't know if it's actually meaningful, but it's a little something.

What is likely happening is that the TV channel does the math: 3,941,826 at 56.6% means we want to put 2 231 073.516 on the screen for Biden - round it up to 074.

The Edison API is rounding as well, to the nearest 0.1%. These rounding errors (and the fact that it's imprecise to start) can result in the appearance of votes disappearing or being deducted.

2
MNMathtic 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are 3 problems with your theory.

  1. It can't be a rounding error because the discrepancies are larger than a rounding error could describe. An error of 0.1% is about 3000 votes, nowhere near the 17000+ flip.

  2. The numbers that switch from Trump to Biden are exactly the same, which wouldn't happen if you're rounding values.

  3. The values provided by Edison are different than what appears on the screen, so I imagine that the networks get the actual numbers but Edison only stores the percentages to save space.

An analysis by fishyPussy on another thread shows:

"PA:

Using data:

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

Before at time 2020-11-04T04:07:43Z

Trump: 0.566 * 2984468 = 1689208.888

Biden: 0.42 * 2984468 = 1253476.56

After at time 2020-11-04T04:08:51Z

Trump: 0.56 * 2984522 = 1671332.32

Biden: 0.426 * 2984522 = 1271406.372

New votes = 2984522 - 2984468 = 54

Trump's change: 1671332.32 - 1689208.888 = -17876.568

Biden's change: 1271406.372 - 1253476.56 = 17929.812"

https://thedonald.win/p/11QRkHpBIt/reminder-19958-pennsylvania-vote/c/

0
Walbort 0 points ago +1 / -1

It could also happen if the total votes and percentages get out of sync for one data drop, then sync up the next one.

1
Aaaahhhh 1 point ago +1 / -0

The enemy has beem identified, attack

1
slewrock 1 point ago +1 / -0

People need to understand that the numbers on TV are from data feeds and not from a typist manually entering them

1
CrackerSmurf2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Old news is compiled and filed everything new comes first and old news is memory holed but, still compiled.

1
EmyAmeGPGM 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone had up a great video of 4 networks synced like a zoom shot. It was complete election coverage for hours. Anyone know where to find that?

1
mvrak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the fake news is not a primary source. It doesn't prove anything.

1
thekindlyman555 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'll just say that it was a mistake by CNN and these are unofficial numbers.

1
Afedupamerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok autists, we need the exact time this took place because we can cross reference with the raw data from Pennsylvania. The updates are time stamped.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
J2daHizzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

fucking hell!

1
FuckYouAsWell 1 point ago +1 / -0

We haven’t forgotten. We’re simply waiting watching and hoping. Hoping that the jury box will sort this out before we sort it out with the ammo box.

The sleeping bear is stirring. Let’s hope it doesn’t wake up.

1
Moebius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Post to twitter and avoid any hashtag flags or terms

0
chopz 0 points ago +1 / -1

This image was created here.