4334
Comments (252)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
97
Rreidy8286 97 points ago +97 / -0

If true. The only way they could really know that is if they have the raw data from that server. How else would they know the totals?

55
Bonami 55 points ago +55 / -0

My thought as well and as a lawyer she would only speak on facts.

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
2
vv33cl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could u explain what that means

5
donotclickjim 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dominion has a rank choice option allowed it to weight votes. Trump allegedly was set at .75 and Biden 1.25. So for every Trump vote it was worth less than a vote for Biden. This is the reason Edison data is in a percentage rather than a raw number. It would reveal the votes as decimals rathe than whole numbers. Sworn affidavits have stated the raw vote totals from the machines show the votes have decimals rather than whole numbers which is a way to maintain a steady race to look close whole also "flipping" votes from one candadite to the other.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
46
UnmaskedPatriot 46 points ago +46 / -0

If they were able to figure out exactly what the algorithm did and reverse engineer it. I'm still guessing they just have the raw data. I'm also wondering if that raw data contains information about a ballot and whether it was printed (marked) or not. Talk about a smoking gun.

8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
11
Bonami 11 points ago +11 / -0

Cross the streams :)

3
redstampede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Algorithms don't necessarily work that way.

1
theantirobot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says who, public key encryption?

I just hope they have actual evidence that a decent portion of lefties will be able to accept.

1
redstampede 1 point ago +1 / -0

The algorithm could be anything, like add X votes (reversible) or change this digit to a 7 if it's less than 7, or add a pseudorandom number that no longer exists. If there's no path back to the original data then it's not a reversible algorithm.

1
hisnamewasjeff 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well yeah. I guess they do have it?

-39
deleted -39 points ago +7 / -46
20
JwPATX 20 points ago +20 / -0

They’ll put it up in court.

-30
deleted -30 points ago +3 / -33
20
crypticreptile 20 points ago +20 / -0

You don't publish evidence of an active case in the media before it's provided in court. That shit is what you do when there is no court case and you only care about manipulating narratives.

When there's a murder trial prosecution doesn't go to CNN and give them the murder weapon, at most they say they have the murder weapon. Just usually the media assumes they aren't lying and reports it as truth, whereas in this case they do the opposite.

9
JwPATX 9 points ago +9 / -0

If they don’t, then they don’t. Powell delivered on every “oUtRaGeOuS” claim she made regarding Flynn’s prosecution. What could she stand to gain by lying? Money? I guess, but I’m pretty sure she’s got a bit of that already. It’s certain ruination to go out on this limb without “bringing the goods.”

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
-10
deleted -10 points ago +1 / -11
9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0