I'm not familiar with American tort law. Do they do discovery for lawsuits? I thought that was just for litigation.
Either way, this legal filing is pure rhetoric. That alone is why it will be thrown out. "After unsuccessfully filling many unsuccessful lawsuits..." the were unsuccesfully unsuccessful in their un-success.
Seriously?
Also 'they were debunked' is not an argument against claims of voter fraud. What claims were debunked? How were they debunked? Maybe this stuff is explained more in the body of the submission, but I doubt the courts will have much sympathy for this.
Discovery means that both sides have to reveal witnesses and evidence that will be introduced at a trial. They can depose witnesses, under oath. That means the voters would have to turn over all of the voting data to prove Pres. Trump violated their rights. When they do that all of the fraud would be exposed. Not only would they lose but it could lead to all of their votes being tossed by the court and Trump would win Michigan.
I'm not familiar with American tort law. Do they do discovery for lawsuits? I thought that was just for litigation.
Either way, this legal filing is pure rhetoric. That alone is why it will be thrown out. "After unsuccessfully filling many unsuccessful lawsuits..." the were unsuccesfully unsuccessful in their un-success.
Seriously?
Also 'they were debunked' is not an argument against claims of voter fraud. What claims were debunked? How were they debunked? Maybe this stuff is explained more in the body of the submission, but I doubt the courts will have much sympathy for this.
Discovery means that both sides have to reveal witnesses and evidence that will be introduced at a trial. They can depose witnesses, under oath. That means the voters would have to turn over all of the voting data to prove Pres. Trump violated their rights. When they do that all of the fraud would be exposed. Not only would they lose but it could lead to all of their votes being tossed by the court and Trump would win Michigan.