https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIlI46HdqKg
OK, so I have finished watching the video and I will try to describe what is in it. The author has done a deep dive into the votes for Philadelphia on Nov 4 using the data on the NY Times website.
The author notices suspicious patterns. The votes are coming in at exact fixed ratios across multiple precincts. For example exactly 1 Trump vote per exactly 6 Biden votes. These "fixed ratio batches" are coming in for multiple precincts in discrete time segments. So, for say 2 hours, votes into a certain precinct are coming in at exactly at this 6:1 ratio. Then moments later the computer reporting votes in a different precinct at exactly this 6:1 ratio. It's not "averaging out at 6 to 1" like you might expect from an actual count, but it's coming in precisely fixed, exactly 6 Biden votes to 1 Trump vote. Again and again.
The author has identified an number of other ratios that were used to stuff the ballot boxes until the desired total was reached. At the 36 minute mark the author describes the scheme he's observed.
So it's a partial deconstruction of the Dominion vote stuffing or vote switching algorithm. Towards the end of the video, if you want to fast-forward, the author draws a helpful diagram that indicates how the scheme appears to work.
EDIT: The author of the video made this helpful summary graph https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds and he actually posts here https://thedonald.win/p/11QRkGgVT6/smoking-gun-i-discovered-dominio/
EDIT2: Let's get more eyes on this and see if we can find other cities where this type of fraud happened and see if we can make it into an easier-to-understand summary.
Basically it passes the ratio between a number of precincts at a given update interval and continues until the gap is closed and the desired candidate takes the lead. This attempts to obscure the algorithm fraud. It also explains why the democrats need time to cook the numbers and “find the ballots” the ballots don’t actually matter as much necessarily. It could be a hold o it batch of 100 ballots here it there. So long as they keep the counting going, and the election open, that gives the algorithm time to apply the fixed ratio on any number of small precincts. Compounded over the course of hundreds of precincts this eliminates the Trump lead.
Ie: hold back the precinct counts , doesn’t matter where. Just keep enough votes uncounted , or find them, and you guarantee the win. The only thing the algorithm needs are available ballots to “count” (ie: “fix”) and give the algorithm enough time to spread the fraud across multiple precincts over time, and your candidate wins every.fucking.time.
Holy shit this is big shit. This is signal you guys.
You should reiterate this. The algorithm needs time and uncounted ballots. Maybe that's why Michigan's Secretary of State was 'Johnny on the spot' sending out mail-in ballot applications to every Michigander and then some, while Covid was still ramping up (Michigan is never so coordinated, and it wasn't her job anyway). Also why she said beforehand we should consider it to be an election week and not an election day...