6432
. . . (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by spez__ ago by spez__ +6432 / -0
Comments (156)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
67
Anubis1 67 points ago +67 / -0

After taking the case all the way to the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, it has been ruled that a Royal Flush beats 5 of a kind. Newcomer Amy Coney Barret writes "While the rules may not be clear, the founders clearly intended the Royal Flush to be the ultimate winning hand, therefore we must conclude Biden's mathematically and statistically impossible hand to not 'Trump' (Judge Amy Coney Barret audibly laughs, saying 'Tee-Hee') President Trumps legitimate legal victory."

Judge Roberts writes the dissenting opinion: "After careful discussions with the two stupidest judges still alive, God Bless the Late Great Ruth Bader Ginsberg, I come to the same conclusion that 'Not a fucking idiot diversity hire Sotomayor' and 'When the fuck did Kagan get put on the bench' did. Trump is mean and orange. What are we voting about again?"

16
Thundfin87 16 points ago +16 / -0

I laughed, but then the poker knowledge in me asked how Trump would have a royal flush if Biden had 5 aces? That would assume not one, but at least two of those aces are fake, making the story even better.

5
negiasu 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh man I didn't even realize that. Thats true