Comments (36)
sorted by:
8
Cue_Cumber 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah. 95 miles of vehicles rolling down I10, flying American & Trump flags -- they were all heading to the polls to vote for Biden. You know, the guy who slipped in quietly, didn't tell anyone he was there, held a "rally" (where he probably finalized the steal deal with Dominion reps) and slipped out again unnoticed.

Yep, he won Maricopa (Phoenix). Suuuuuuure he did.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
3
Thinkgod 3 points ago +3 / -0

Coming on here shilling for China isn't a good indicator you believe biden won

3
stoic_troll 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. Dominion Voting Machines and AP consensus generation machine are much better indicators.

4
TooTallTurtle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why are we unironically posting links to AP articles? Why not archive the 'story' instead of supplying a link that supplies them funds? This 'story' is nothing but propaganda anyways so why bother?

1
Anaconda 1 point ago +2 / -1

OP is a Pedo Joe asslicker

4
Thinkgod 4 points ago +4 / -0

You guys don't realize this is a shill?

4
Anaconda 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yawn...going to SCOTUS

-5
deleted -5 points ago +3 / -8
4
GuruNemesis 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Trump team has not filed 24 lawsuits, shill harder cuck.

4
dtm123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Stop spouting off main stream media BS.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
2
starsabove 2 points ago +2 / -0

It true though, right? The SC may not even hear any of Trumps cases. Boy will he need some solid evidence. Hearsay and Affidavits not backed backed up with anymore substantial evidence won't play well with the Supreme Court.

No, its not true. The Trump legal team have only filed a handful of lawsuits, which they've either won or are still working their way through. When idiots claim 24, 33, 48 cases dismissed, they're referring to suits brought by unaffiliated local groups questioning the election fraud.

Second, you shouldn't equate 'hearsay' and 'affidavits' together or assume they're on the same legal ground. Sworn, under oath testimony is evidence and often critical to a court case. Hearsay and conjecture are not.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
komenos_9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Address the other points, go ahead, say it “ I’m wrong, Trump has not lost 24 lawsuits because those lawsuits were not filed by Trumps team”. You got it from cnn, or msnbc?

Say it so we can .Simpson’s meme.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
stoic_troll 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope he's 20 and 20.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
2
Bullwinkle 2 points ago +2 / -0

You obviously don’t speak English.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Bullwinkle 2 points ago +2 / -0

I “get’s” it.

2
GuruNemesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hearsay is testimony by a person about something they heard someone else say.

An affidavit is direct evidence, that being the sworn testimony under threat of perjury to details the person has direct knowledge of.

Why troll if you can't get your facts right?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
GuruNemesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who said we're not investigating their claims?

Don't you have anything better to do that spend your night exposing your ignorance?

You don't understand rules of evidence, you don't know who's the plaintiff in the cases... what do you know, other than how to lick corporate democrat boots?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Ieggo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kelly Ward is doing a horrible job.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pack it in boys.