Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Whenever the most negative, sinister, propaganda tabloid stops calling you racist, white nationalists, stupid, and says 'Hey MAGA folks!' I think it's natural to assume whatever follows is yet another deception. This is like the snake in the garden of eden saying 'Hey Eve, check out this nice looking fruit that will make you smart.'
Absolutely. It's been apparent to me for a long time that whatever the MSM says to do or wants me to think, usually the exact opposite is true. They are very consistent with their lies and manipulation.
(Not smart, immutably aware of the nature of good and evil, a stolen innocence, after a fashion, an introduction of corruption, like satanists raping a child)
Exactly. But it's interesting that if you dive into it, it is satan that makes us human.
It is why we all have the original sin inside of us. There is no such thing as humanity without satan. We have to live with that and be in constant battle with it.
We were just as animals, oblivious of good and evil, creatures of earth among the rest.
The apple opened our mind and soul to understand actions, emotions, reason and more.
In the US, we use "Folk" to mean "people", but actually the word has a much more specific meaning. In particular, it's a bastardization of the word "Volk"...which refers to anyone in the german cultural block - anyone from the Rhine to Ukraine basically. The concept was really popular among nazis.
Basically - 50% chance the writer is just ignorant and 50% chance he thinks he's being clever and subtly calling us nazis to our face.
Trump uses the rhetorical question, "Don't we, folks?" all the time.Volk is a German word, not a Nazi word. Unless you think all Germans are Nazis. Trump used it first. I'm reminded of a scene from the movie Office Space.
Michael: "Michael Bolton: There was nothing wrong with it… until I was about 12 years old and that no-talent ass-clown became famous and started winning Grammys."
Samir: 'Why don't you just go by Mike?"
Michael: "No way, why should I change? he's the one who sucks."
You're not wrong. The difference is good faith. I have every reason to believe Trump is using the normal American use of the word. I also have every reason to believe this op ed author is badly motivated and might attempt a veiled insult.
It's like if I'm hanging out with my friends and someone calls me "bitch" I'll react very differently than if someone cuts me off in traffic and then calls me "bitch". Same word, different context.
Who honestly says "folks" except as a shorthand for direct family?
"I'm going to visit my folks", you don't assume they're going to visit a black power riot, or a MAGA march, or a yakuza initiation, you assume they're going to visit a blood relative, likely parents.
The only people to use "folkxs" in this manner are weird stilted leftists.
Whenever he was “complimented” as having boyish charm it made me cringe. Guy is pushing 50. Then I learned about his being expelled from a school in Switzerland. Started to click that he’s one of those spoiled rich kids who never fully matured, could get away with silliness and even criminality. His affinity for Hunter became obvious. His supposed defiance of the elites almost entirely a pose. As for what he really believes and thinks, I’m not certain he knows. I think sometimes a contrarian only works in reaction to others.
Honestly, that might be this Wemple guy's intent... Tucker had an ongoing feud with him towards the beginning of his primetime run on FOX. He butted heads with him probably as often as Kurt "Tentacle Enthusiast" Eichenwald, and even sold Wemple themed mugs:
I think the intent is to encourage in-fighting within this community. The ideal situation for the opposition is to divide Trump supporters along certain controversial issues, and since most are against Tucker they want to toss him some support but more importantly they just want to keep the issue alive for its potential to cause division. They don’t really care if we support Tucker or not. They only care that it’s an issue that has potential to cause in-fighting and weaken the community.
Note that Bannon saying not to discuss the Tucker issue is ironically a meta issue that has possibly more potential to cause division than the original issue, since most on here are against Tucker but people seem fairly evenly split between thinking the issue should or shouldn’t be discussed.
I don’t think that any mainstream media personality should be totally trusted, and once they take an anti-trump position like Tucker did by attacking Sidney Powell they should at least be treated with a high degree of suspicion if not totally abandoned. However, to the extent that a guy like Tucker might still support Trump on certain issues, he could be viewed as useful for that purpose—he just can’t be trusted.
This is a good post. It is a very standard tactic to whip up internal disputes within an enemy faction. Just about the oldest trick in the book.
I don't like, at all, what Tucker did but he has also done such sterling service in the past, and literally faced physical danger for it (remember when Antifa rioted outside his house?) that I will give him the benefit of the doubt, for now. How much longer he keeps that is up to him. He needs to stand up to his corrupt sellout bosses at Fox, if he leaves the network to speak freely, I think we should give him a chance.
I think the important thing is not really whether you give Tucker a chance or not, but remembering not to engage in in-fighting (as opposed to respectful debate) with other true Trump supporters over their decision to abandon Tucker or not, whether they agree with Bannon’s statements about signal/noise, etc.
So you're saying Sidney Powell is part of a lefty psyop? Pull the other one. He treated her like crap.
He got his material from us to gain our trust, but he is only a conduit for our message, and if he fails to accomplish that, he's not our boy. THE ONLY CULT OF PERSONALITY WE WANT HERE IS FOR THE PRESIDENT.
We don't need newsactors and we don't need authorities. We are the investigative reporters. We are the town criers. We celebrate those who amplify our message, but they're not our masters and they don't make our opinions. If they're on our side, we make theirs.
Frankly, we have no reason to trust Steve Bannon who also took up for Tucker and SCOLDED US for bringing attention to it. I do not want to see War Room stickied here any more. Bannon isn't trustworthy.
Steve Bannon committed perjury against Roger Stone during that poor man's persecution and I have NO idea why he's being idolized here! WTF??
Btw, even General Flynn is upset with Tucker. I think Carlson's been a "sleeper" against us the entire time.
we have no reason to trust Steve Bannon who also took up for Tucker and SCOLDED US for bringing attention to it.
This^ I don't take orders from Steve Bannon. He turned on President Trump, cost us a seat in Alabama, and fucked over Roger Stone. Got no use for the guy.
The fact that he has a problem with what Powell is saying means either he's dumb as glass or he's controlled opposition.
Keep in mind a centrist/neutral standpoint would be to say that any claims of fraud should not be dismissed out of hand, but so far Fox has not been provided with any evidence.
Instead, Tucker launched into a bit about how they have more evidence on UFOs than Powell's claims.
UFOs are real. The only reason people don't know about the evidence is the media has spent decades gaslighting and mocking anyone who said as much. Exactly what they are doing now with evidence of election fraud. If they are suddenly saying the opposite, it's definitely a distraction or they are up to something like you say. UFOs have been in our skies since at least the 1930s. They aren't doing anything new or different, whatever they are.
The bulk of your message is good; however, your opening question is flawed. There is a scenario where Tucker and Powell had miscommunication and he thought maybe she had been turned or was sabotaging the case.
Wait and see with Tucker, don't let a leftist rag reinforce your doubts about him. The Washington Post is CIA, it is quite plausible that they expect this op-ed to further distance us from the only mainstream anchor we have any trust for.
Tucker deserves a chance at redemption, yet our wariness in trusting him right now is also justified. If he is comprised, that will become more apparent through his own words, not the CIA's.
Just want to point this out... "a miscommunication" might have happened, but why would TC feel the need to blast SP on air? It was a shit move, for no reason, and done at a terrible time. He hurt the President with his curlish behavior, and that makes him an asshoe.
Agree, I mean the guy has been a patriot forever, and he does one wrong move and he’s out, although there is that thing with Hunter Biden too.... but for the most part he was pretty good and cared about the country
although there is that thing with Hunter Biden too
Don't forget when he immediately went with the 'salary dispute' narrative for Juicy Smollett, never making the connection between him and Kamala Harris' lynching legislation which passed as a result of the hoax
They overplayed their hand. They've had him parrot back our talking points so we'd trust him and they thought they could push our train of thought this way or that if he nudged us along and this time they pushed just a little too hard and got caught.
I’m willing to give Tucker a shot still. I think he’s hedging his bets at this point though, which I have mixed feelings about.
With Hunter Biden, Tucker covered a lot of it. I think he tried shifting the focus away from Hunter’s dong not because he likes Hunter but because it was getting in the way of the actual message of the laptop: that Joe Biden was peddling influence and doing everything Trump accused him of doing with the Ukraine and elsewhere. We all got caught up in dick pics and at times choice clams and it didn’t help the message of the laptop.
think he tried shifting the focus away from Hunter’s dong not because he likes Hunter but because it was getting in the way of the actual message of the laptop: that Joe Biden was peddling influence and doing everything Trump accused him of doing with the Ukraine and elsewhere
There's enough time in his show to cover all that. It's pretty significant news that he was having sex with his own underage neice with text messages all but verifying it. If you want to continue to sit under tucker's ballsack while he teabags you, you're a free citizen
I gave Tucker the benefit of the doubt up until the Sidney Powell thing (and the doubling down last night), but I don't think it's some grand conspiracy. I think he IS getting some pressure from management, but I think his instinct is just to default to the establishment consensus in times of crisis (just like his personally convincing Trump to buy into Covid hysteria) and that's what's driving this. If the states are all saying you lost and the AP has called it, you just concede in his mind - that's how it's always been done. He just has bad, kneejerk instincts when the pressure is on. He's watched the same people frame Trump on Russia, Ukraine, white supremacy and a million other things, but it's like he's incapable of believing they would rig an election, too. He's lived in DC forever and is friends with all of the establishment people, but likes to slum with the populists from time to time on his show.
Or in a few weeks we'll find out Sidney and Rudy really are full of it (doubt it), at which point we may eventually forgive Tucker.
He's lived in DC forever and is friends with all of the establishment people...
That's all you need to know if whether he's with us or not. He was NEVER with us! The sooner everyone realizes that and moves on from TUCK THE CUCK the better.
So what's your point? Are you suggesting Trump is establishment and not for us? I surely hope that's not what you're implying because you're about to get downvoted into oblivion. Again, what is your point?
No I'm not cause most people on here can read what I said without jumping to ridiculous conclusions. You don't have the power you think you have keyboard warrior
Another way to look at Tucker is the wartime/peacetime personality. Dr. Nassir Ghaemi's book A Fine Madness goes into civil war leaders who were great on paper but choked on the battlefield. Trump is wartime, he does not choke when the going gets tough, he fights. Tucker is great in peacetime but it didn't take much to rattle his cage hard enough that he folded.
Tucker's a peacetime hero. You'd want to have a beer with him.
KING HENRY V
Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more;
Or close the wall up with our English dead.
In peace there's nothing so becomes a man
As modest stillness and humility:
But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
Then imitate the action of the tiger;
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage;
That's a great way of looking at it - I wish I had thought of it, it would have saved me a hundred words. It's like from The Godfather: a wartime or peacetime consiglieri.
The other word that fits this personality type is the "homoclite" which has nothing to do with homosexuality. Look up homoclites, it's an interesting discussion.
I agree somewhat. Tucker's always struck me as reactionary and not exactly full of thought. Doesn't mean he's not part of the machine though. Like you could point him at some issue you know he'd have a problem with, and he'd bark like a rabid dog.
In Powell's case, a producer could say, hey Tuck, I don't believe Powell at all, go try and get some more info from her -- knowing full well that Powell's not going to publicly reveal the hard evidence in an ongoing case.
My opinion, he's always been controlled opposition.
The left made Tucker cover for Hunter Biden and attempt to discredit Sidney Powel? Tucker isn't a victim here. And WaPo is the unimportant ravings of a mad woman.
No argument there. Although, don't you find it off that WaPo is speaking to "MAGA folks" in the first place, after never acknowledging us for anything else except scorn? And, that they're speaking about this particular kerfuffle? They're tossing oil on the stove.
You walk past the WaPo on the street and she stops her incessant unintelligible ravings just long enough to yell "THAT'S MY COAT" at you as you walk by. You know it's not her coat, but now you are wondering why she would say that shit. It's nothing more than the WaPo trying to interject themselves into the conversation. Trying to be relevant. Stinking of desperation.
His name is Cucker TuckGame he's an actor sad to say he's our version of AOC. He was likable he said a lot of things that we wanted to hear but when we really needed him he was a traitor.
The bar for "evidence" is set at definitive proof that can be fit into an easily digestable two minute bit. If you feel entitled to the impossible, you're a moron. Tucker should go look at a tree or something.
He's basically implying that Sidney Powell is full of shit - he's not outright saying it, but was apparently confrontational with her and has done two shows in a row casting serious doubt on her claims.
Predictably, the media is using Tucker's soundbites to try and torpedo Trump's case.
I tuned out of Fox post election, but Tucker was always spot on IMO. I've only read here people crying about him now. I just watched this clip. Is this seriously the worst of it? He's making fair points and never says Trump is full of it, he comes across as he's always comes across. Anyone should want evidence for such a large claim like this. Sentiment around Tucker on here is ridiculous if this video is the extent of his "selling out".
Tucker's still a hell of a lot better than everyone else in the MSM and his opinion doesn't change the outcome of any court cases, I don't see why people are so upset about that. We can't afford to lose allies.
They are pissed because his quotations are being used to discredit Trump's case, and because he's making a big deal about it at a pivotal time when he doesn't have any evidence to the contrary so far.
I like Tucker, and if you see my comments above, I don't think he's part of a conspiracy, but he's really fucking up just like he did when he personally lobbied Trump to buy into lockdown nonsense.
An ally doesn't stab you in the back. An ally doesn't defend a well-known sexual deviant and pedophile aka Hunter Biden. An ally doesn't call a pedophile a "good guy with some problems." An ally doesn't concern troll and throw a patriotic lawyer under the bus simply because she refuses to hand over all of her evidence to help him lift his falling ratings. He's a piece of shit.
He defended Hunter Biden and called him a "good guy with some problems." As if defending a pedophile wasn't bad enough, he then shits on the Sidney Powell. Her reputation is sterling. We shouldn't be surprised though.. Tucker was originally a "journalist" on MSNBC and CNN before he came to FOX.
The Left kill each other. "Only the strong survive". Acting like we're still in the caves, and it's what their attitudes try to do! Destroy the planet until we're all living in caves.
Who the fuck would join a Leftist system if there was no other system? Choosing fear, suffering - a literal Hell? There's only one way a Leftist system ends, and it's not with happy trails. You're not gonna burn your way into Heaven - that's the trick to go to the OTHER place.
And you know who wrote that article? Erik Wemple. The guy Tucker made fun of for the better part of 3 years. Guess that was fake too and they were buddies all along.
Did you read the whole article? It’s still unabashedly anti-Tucker and mocks us for ever having listened to him. It’s only meant for his reader base to reaffirm their stance on us being oh so credulous
I just finished reading it and it's exactly how it comes off as. "Come on, idiots, this is literally the only man in the planet that bullshits you about how orange man is not bad".
Not that I'm shocked, but I'd expect this level of estrogen-fueled snark from Buzzfeed bloggers.
I was riding in coach on a flight a few years ago, and Animal House was on the in-flight entertainment. I hadn't seen it in decades, so I started watching it.
I was in the aisle seat, and the plane was full, so there was a young lady maybe in her early twenties sitting in the center seat beside me.
I assumed all the raunchier parts would have been cut or edited out, but when it got to the scene where Bluto peeps through the sorority house window, it was uncut. That embarrassed me, so I quickly stopped the movie and watched something else.
At some point later in the flight I caught a bit of what the lady next to me was watching out of the corner of my eye, and it looked like straight-up soft porn like they used to run on Cinemax in the 1980s.
Good old Skinemax. Going to the blocked channels late at night waving an arm in the air with the feverish hope of seeing a nipple and maybe 2 boobies if only for a few seconds. The best of times.
I suspect it is possible all those things can be true. He works for the company. Believes in the words he speaks. Is "on our side" yet sold out for reasons that scare the shit out him.
Suppose he WAS recruited by intelligence for a moment. We know from the Church commission in the 70s that cia employed people in media to follow narrative. We also know they made the program voluntary instead of scrapping it.
What do you think Tucker was told or mandated when he started? "Here's the plan tucker .... you're on board? Great!" I doubt it. Compartmentalization is how you keep information from spreading. My company does it all the time to prevent leaks before products come out. He was told just enough to make him believe he was acting in his principled interests. Fox is run by Murdoch. NOT a conservative. Just a rich guy filling a market niche. Fox always has been a pawn in a sick game to control the discussion of the masses.
I haven’t had the time to be on here for a few days and all of a sudden Tucker is Megyn Kelley.
I’m asking why.
Best I can tell it was because of something he said about Powell on his show.
So I went back and watched, and all he said is she made a lot of claims, we offered her unlimited time to come on the show and present evidence, and she not only refused but said stop bothering me.
Is this why ppl are mad at Tucker? I’m actually asking, and can’t find an answer.
Ok again putting words in my mouth, Tucker is not Megyn Kelley wtf? If you don't know why people are mad at Tucker than you're not paying attention, it predates whatever fued he has with Sidney. It's the fact that he has fully bought into the narrative that there isn't enough fraud to overturn the election and he is peddling that garbage to the, at one time, largest audience in all of cable news.
Pathetic. You've had dozens of examples to see Carlson's treachery, from the Kavanaugh hearing, to the fearmongering of Covid, to so much more. You're an idiot or a shill.
Finally got my parents off Fox News though. All I had to do was predict exactly how the election would go. Finally they can get in touch with some real news.
Did the same with my mother-in-law. Took her to see a Trump boat parade, hundreds and hundreds of boats. Told her that the news wouldn't cover it or pretend hardly anyone participated. She didn't believe me. Sure enough, there was a 10 second blurb on local news that showed two boats. She woke up.
The biggest mistake Tucker made was that he thought it was about him and not the MAGA movement. The way he cheerfully said that the rumors of him leaving Fox is false and while gloating that he was actually offered more hours/programming at Fox showed me what kind of person he is.
Guys I'm gonna go point out this snake that's irrelevant, but don't worry you guys go fight the British empire. The snake is more important to waste resources and time on.
Guys guys, I know we pointed out a hundred times yesterday that there's someone we don't like anymore. But I can't control myself so I'm going to keep wasting everyone's time pointing something out that's irrelevant to what's going on.
You need to grow up. You're behaving like a middle/high school kid going on and on about what someone you thought was cool said. Pay attention to what matters and stop wasting resources on irrelevant people. It's like you've never ended a relationship before, move on.
LOLWUT? I know the Tolerant Left™ gets off on ordering normal people around... but why would one of the most obvious sources of Leftist propaganda think we would take their advice on anything?
I'm pretty sure if you go back 3 weeks, the Washington Post would have been posting articles bashing Tucker Carlson as MSM always has. Now suddenly that he is seen as "helpful" by contradicting Sidney Powell they are trying to boost his ratings? CLOWN WORLD IS NO JOKE
WaPo isn't just a blatant propaganda organ like Der Sturmer, although Bezos is pushing it harder than ever in that direction. WaPo has always had another, more subtle role. It's the daily cheat sheet for the left.
Amateur leftists all over America get daily talking points from the Washington Post, specifically to feed their friends and family who don't know that they read the Washington Post. That's what makes the propaganda more subtle and effective. It gets around our defenses by appearing to be common-sense reasoning from people just like us, when in reality it's anything but that.
Riiiiiiiiight... the same Washington Post, that's been a Trump hating machine for 4 years, and has been wrong on just about every issue of substance since Bezos bought it for chump change now thinks we'll take a single thing they say seriously?
Self awareness score -100
"They're not following the Judas Goat. They're just milling around on the ramp. We've got an entire shift sitting around getting paid for nothing. Now, you get those sheep up the ramp right now!"
This is simple reverse psychology. They want people to ditch Tucker. They have no reason to think a clear anti-Trump article on their left wing news site would motivate conservatives to give him another chance. Just the opposite, using themselves as a damaging endorsement.
Not that it's necessary. I'm not planning to watch him anymore anyway, so unfortunately I'll be granting their wish.
I don´t think they have the mental capacity for something like reverse psychology, especially not the author of that article based on the way he writes.
Me personally find that excerpt here really telling:
Keep in mind that Carlson is trying to hold together a vast community of viewers, a sliver of which believes he’s an honest broker who keeps everyone honest
I think in his mind he sees Tucker as a centralized tool to lead the masses by his "honesty". Think about it, a decentralized organic community like this here is much harder to control if there is no central information source.
This is exactly how they control all the other sheep, so why couldn´t it work for us?
I tell you why it couldn´t, because people here actually care about the truth and integrity. Sure, people here as well can be misled by stories and wanting-it-to-be-true bias is real but that attitude remains at its core.
Honestly fuck MSM, they should all die out already like the disfunct tools they are.
Kiss of death.
Reputations are like glass. Tucker smashed his reputation. You don't recover from that.
Fuck that cucked tuck
Greetings, fellow MAGA folks!
Whenever the most negative, sinister, propaganda tabloid stops calling you racist, white nationalists, stupid, and says 'Hey MAGA folks!' I think it's natural to assume whatever follows is yet another deception. This is like the snake in the garden of eden saying 'Hey Eve, check out this nice looking fruit that will make you smart.'
Absolutely. It's been apparent to me for a long time that whatever the MSM says to do or wants me to think, usually the exact opposite is true. They are very consistent with their lies and manipulation.
(Not smart, immutably aware of the nature of good and evil, a stolen innocence, after a fashion, an introduction of corruption, like satanists raping a child)
Exactly. But it's interesting that if you dive into it, it is satan that makes us human.
It is why we all have the original sin inside of us. There is no such thing as humanity without satan. We have to live with that and be in constant battle with it.
We were just as animals, oblivious of good and evil, creatures of earth among the rest.
The apple opened our mind and soul to understand actions, emotions, reason and more.
Exactly.
So on point!
Don't give up on snek.
Thanks, Pede.
Trump calls us patriots not folks.
Thank you! I fucking hate the "folks" thing! Only fucking elitist phonies say that, when attempting to appeal to "normal" people, did you ever notice?
Get woke, Go broke!
hello caterpillar what a great day it is to be racist and sexist!
That’s just hilarious. Made me laugh!
Greetings my fellow white folks!
I think your spelling is off, yet intuitively, I knew just what you said.
In the US, we use "Folk" to mean "people", but actually the word has a much more specific meaning. In particular, it's a bastardization of the word "Volk"...which refers to anyone in the german cultural block - anyone from the Rhine to Ukraine basically. The concept was really popular among nazis.
Basically - 50% chance the writer is just ignorant and 50% chance he thinks he's being clever and subtly calling us nazis to our face.
Trump uses the rhetorical question, "Don't we, folks?" all the time.Volk is a German word, not a Nazi word. Unless you think all Germans are Nazis. Trump used it first. I'm reminded of a scene from the movie Office Space.
Michael: "Michael Bolton: There was nothing wrong with it… until I was about 12 years old and that no-talent ass-clown became famous and started winning Grammys."
Samir: 'Why don't you just go by Mike?"
Michael: "No way, why should I change? he's the one who sucks."
You're not wrong. The difference is good faith. I have every reason to believe Trump is using the normal American use of the word. I also have every reason to believe this op ed author is badly motivated and might attempt a veiled insult.
It's like if I'm hanging out with my friends and someone calls me "bitch" I'll react very differently than if someone cuts me off in traffic and then calls me "bitch". Same word, different context.
50% chance of A WAPO author being clever?
I'll fucking take those odds!
It's the mark of the leftist: Thinking that they fight for "the people" while simultaneously looking down on the common man.
Who honestly says "folks" except as a shorthand for direct family?
"I'm going to visit my folks", you don't assume they're going to visit a black power riot, or a MAGA march, or a yakuza initiation, you assume they're going to visit a blood relative, likely parents.
The only people to use "folkxs" in this manner are weird stilted leftists.
Fuck of death? XD
If Tucker hadn't changed, he seriously had a good shot at Presidency in 2024+
He was the guy during the rioting and looting this summer. He was the only one who'd talk about Hunter. Now he's just another talking head.
Whenever he was “complimented” as having boyish charm it made me cringe. Guy is pushing 50. Then I learned about his being expelled from a school in Switzerland. Started to click that he’s one of those spoiled rich kids who never fully matured, could get away with silliness and even criminality. His affinity for Hunter became obvious. His supposed defiance of the elites almost entirely a pose. As for what he really believes and thinks, I’m not certain he knows. I think sometimes a contrarian only works in reaction to others.
Tucker for president? What color's the sky in your world?
You sound like someone from 2015 saying a reality tv star couldn't be President.
Or an actor in 1979.
Neither Reagan or Trump were talking heads for corporate media.
putting tooth paste back in the tube
Honestly, that might be this Wemple guy's intent... Tucker had an ongoing feud with him towards the beginning of his primetime run on FOX. He butted heads with him probably as often as Kurt "Tentacle Enthusiast" Eichenwald, and even sold Wemple themed mugs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZX1KlXhMw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0erOLzryN0
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/02/15/tucker_carlson_roasts_washington_posts_erik_wemple_i_see_you_as_a_political_hack.html
https://tuckercarlsonstore.com/products/tucker-wemple-coffee-mug-1
We're all still worried about what a news anchor says?
They're trying to steal the presidency.
Tucker is done, he's either an idiot or controlled.
This is noise, not the signal.
This guy gets it.
Spot on. I don’t give a crap what anyone says except for POTUS and his team.
^EXACTLY THIS
Bingo!
I think the intent is to encourage in-fighting within this community. The ideal situation for the opposition is to divide Trump supporters along certain controversial issues, and since most are against Tucker they want to toss him some support but more importantly they just want to keep the issue alive for its potential to cause division. They don’t really care if we support Tucker or not. They only care that it’s an issue that has potential to cause in-fighting and weaken the community.
Note that Bannon saying not to discuss the Tucker issue is ironically a meta issue that has possibly more potential to cause division than the original issue, since most on here are against Tucker but people seem fairly evenly split between thinking the issue should or shouldn’t be discussed.
I don’t think that any mainstream media personality should be totally trusted, and once they take an anti-trump position like Tucker did by attacking Sidney Powell they should at least be treated with a high degree of suspicion if not totally abandoned. However, to the extent that a guy like Tucker might still support Trump on certain issues, he could be viewed as useful for that purpose—he just can’t be trusted.
This is a good post. It is a very standard tactic to whip up internal disputes within an enemy faction. Just about the oldest trick in the book.
I don't like, at all, what Tucker did but he has also done such sterling service in the past, and literally faced physical danger for it (remember when Antifa rioted outside his house?) that I will give him the benefit of the doubt, for now. How much longer he keeps that is up to him. He needs to stand up to his corrupt sellout bosses at Fox, if he leaves the network to speak freely, I think we should give him a chance.
I think the important thing is not really whether you give Tucker a chance or not, but remembering not to engage in in-fighting (as opposed to respectful debate) with other true Trump supporters over their decision to abandon Tucker or not, whether they agree with Bannon’s statements about signal/noise, etc.
Nailed it. This is meant to cause infighting and pretty much nothing else.
Have we considered the possibility that this is a coordinated lefty psy-op against Tucker, who has the market cornered on Boomer conservatives?
So you're saying Sidney Powell is part of a lefty psyop? Pull the other one. He treated her like crap.
He got his material from us to gain our trust, but he is only a conduit for our message, and if he fails to accomplish that, he's not our boy. THE ONLY CULT OF PERSONALITY WE WANT HERE IS FOR THE PRESIDENT.
We don't need newsactors and we don't need authorities. We are the investigative reporters. We are the town criers. We celebrate those who amplify our message, but they're not our masters and they don't make our opinions. If they're on our side, we make theirs.
Well, that's how their minds work, so naturally, they'd assume we are the same species of lemming.
Frankly, we have no reason to trust Steve Bannon who also took up for Tucker and SCOLDED US for bringing attention to it. I do not want to see War Room stickied here any more. Bannon isn't trustworthy.
Steve Bannon committed perjury against Roger Stone during that poor man's persecution and I have NO idea why he's being idolized here! WTF??
Btw, even General Flynn is upset with Tucker. I think Carlson's been a "sleeper" against us the entire time.
https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1329976359448416263
This^ I don't take orders from Steve Bannon. He turned on President Trump, cost us a seat in Alabama, and fucked over Roger Stone. Got no use for the guy.
Can someone give a synopsis on why Bannon and Stone are enemies?
100%
This means that Democrats probably do have that level of control over their followers.
What's the limit of what they would do if Rachel Maddo suddenly told them to?
Start with Paul Ryan and Donna Brazile, and who hired them.
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBH8jaS/fox-news-exposed-why-fox-is-cuck/c/
I'm in a CULT FOR NO MAN only for the CONSTITUTION!!
and Jesus
I'm saying the squabble with Sidney Powell is a crack they're trying to drive a wedge into.
The fact that he has a problem with what Powell is saying means either he's dumb as glass or he's controlled opposition.
Keep in mind a centrist/neutral standpoint would be to say that any claims of fraud should not be dismissed out of hand, but so far Fox has not been provided with any evidence.
Instead, Tucker launched into a bit about how they have more evidence on UFOs than Powell's claims.
UFOs are real. The only reason people don't know about the evidence is the media has spent decades gaslighting and mocking anyone who said as much. Exactly what they are doing now with evidence of election fraud. If they are suddenly saying the opposite, it's definitely a distraction or they are up to something like you say. UFOs have been in our skies since at least the 1930s. They aren't doing anything new or different, whatever they are.
The trashing of Sidney Powell serves two purposes:
Demoralize conservatives and seed doubt in their minds that there is any evidence of widespread election fraud.
Boost the morale of Democrats by showing a supposed "MAGA" representative like Tucker agreeing with their narrative that there was no election fraud.
WE ARE THE NEWS!
The bulk of your message is good; however, your opening question is flawed. There is a scenario where Tucker and Powell had miscommunication and he thought maybe she had been turned or was sabotaging the case.
Wait and see with Tucker, don't let a leftist rag reinforce your doubts about him. The Washington Post is CIA, it is quite plausible that they expect this op-ed to further distance us from the only mainstream anchor we have any trust for.
Tucker deserves a chance at redemption, yet our wariness in trusting him right now is also justified. If he is comprised, that will become more apparent through his own words, not the CIA's.
Just want to point this out... "a miscommunication" might have happened, but why would TC feel the need to blast SP on air? It was a shit move, for no reason, and done at a terrible time. He hurt the President with his curlish behavior, and that makes him an asshoe.
Agree, I mean the guy has been a patriot forever, and he does one wrong move and he’s out, although there is that thing with Hunter Biden too.... but for the most part he was pretty good and cared about the country
Benedict Arnold was a patriot too until one wrong move.
A life of good deeds doesn't protect you when you betray people.
Judas Iscariot was the most loyal disciple until he wasn't.
Don't forget when he immediately went with the 'salary dispute' narrative for Juicy Smollett, never making the connection between him and Kamala Harris' lynching legislation which passed as a result of the hoax
I thought he was good too, but my impression now is that he is one of the controlled opposition people that is much more skilled than average.
They overplayed their hand. They've had him parrot back our talking points so we'd trust him and they thought they could push our train of thought this way or that if he nudged us along and this time they pushed just a little too hard and got caught.
I have doubts that Tucker is personally getting data from Sidney. Perhaps one of his staff is sabotaging this? Doubtful, but possible...
I’m willing to give Tucker a shot still. I think he’s hedging his bets at this point though, which I have mixed feelings about.
With Hunter Biden, Tucker covered a lot of it. I think he tried shifting the focus away from Hunter’s dong not because he likes Hunter but because it was getting in the way of the actual message of the laptop: that Joe Biden was peddling influence and doing everything Trump accused him of doing with the Ukraine and elsewhere. We all got caught up in dick pics and at times choice clams and it didn’t help the message of the laptop.
There's enough time in his show to cover all that. It's pretty significant news that he was having sex with his own underage neice with text messages all but verifying it. If you want to continue to sit under tucker's ballsack while he teabags you, you're a free citizen
I question if it was as simple as a multi million dollar bribe given to Tucker. Wondered that about Ingram as well.
Yes, that's what I gave him after he refused to cover the information regarding Hunter Biden and the incest with his underage neice.
If you're still with tucker at this point, you'll follow him right back to where we started before Trump. Cuckservatism.
Any thoughts on this video?: https://streamable.com/cb7kj0
Cut from this Faux News video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXgO7L0rcAQ
I gave Tucker the benefit of the doubt up until the Sidney Powell thing (and the doubling down last night), but I don't think it's some grand conspiracy. I think he IS getting some pressure from management, but I think his instinct is just to default to the establishment consensus in times of crisis (just like his personally convincing Trump to buy into Covid hysteria) and that's what's driving this. If the states are all saying you lost and the AP has called it, you just concede in his mind - that's how it's always been done. He just has bad, kneejerk instincts when the pressure is on. He's watched the same people frame Trump on Russia, Ukraine, white supremacy and a million other things, but it's like he's incapable of believing they would rig an election, too. He's lived in DC forever and is friends with all of the establishment people, but likes to slum with the populists from time to time on his show.
Or in a few weeks we'll find out Sidney and Rudy really are full of it (doubt it), at which point we may eventually forgive Tucker.
That's all you need to know if whether he's with us or not. He was NEVER with us! The sooner everyone realizes that and moves on from TUCK THE CUCK the better.
So what's your point? Are you suggesting Trump is establishment and not for us? I surely hope that's not what you're implying because you're about to get downvoted into oblivion. Again, what is your point?
No I'm not cause most people on here can read what I said without jumping to ridiculous conclusions. You don't have the power you think you have keyboard warrior
and that one dude on twitter, lmao
Another way to look at Tucker is the wartime/peacetime personality. Dr. Nassir Ghaemi's book A Fine Madness goes into civil war leaders who were great on paper but choked on the battlefield. Trump is wartime, he does not choke when the going gets tough, he fights. Tucker is great in peacetime but it didn't take much to rattle his cage hard enough that he folded.
Tucker's a peacetime hero. You'd want to have a beer with him.
So in brief he's a complete coward
KING HENRY V Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. In peace there's nothing so becomes a man As modest stillness and humility: But when the blast of war blows in our ears, Then imitate the action of the tiger; Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage;
He's put more on the line than you... Unless you receive death threats and have protestors in your driveway.
Ok fanboy
That's a great way of looking at it - I wish I had thought of it, it would have saved me a hundred words. It's like from The Godfather: a wartime or peacetime consiglieri.
The other word that fits this personality type is the "homoclite" which has nothing to do with homosexuality. Look up homoclites, it's an interesting discussion.
I think that if he'd known that THIS would be the reaction to his words, he would have used different words. He read the room wrong.
I agree somewhat. Tucker's always struck me as reactionary and not exactly full of thought. Doesn't mean he's not part of the machine though. Like you could point him at some issue you know he'd have a problem with, and he'd bark like a rabid dog.
In Powell's case, a producer could say, hey Tuck, I don't believe Powell at all, go try and get some more info from her -- knowing full well that Powell's not going to publicly reveal the hard evidence in an ongoing case.
My opinion, he's always been controlled opposition.
His punting on the Hunter Laptop story seemed to show he was compromised. Stopped watching him at that moment.
Tucker Carlson: globalist shill.
No thanks.
He's dead to me.
The left made Tucker cover for Hunter Biden and attempt to discredit Sidney Powel? Tucker isn't a victim here. And WaPo is the unimportant ravings of a mad woman.
No argument there. Although, don't you find it off that WaPo is speaking to "MAGA folks" in the first place, after never acknowledging us for anything else except scorn? And, that they're speaking about this particular kerfuffle? They're tossing oil on the stove.
You walk past the WaPo on the street and she stops her incessant unintelligible ravings just long enough to yell "THAT'S MY COAT" at you as you walk by. You know it's not her coat, but now you are wondering why she would say that shit. It's nothing more than the WaPo trying to interject themselves into the conversation. Trying to be relevant. Stinking of desperation.
YOU know it's not her coat, but the crowd around you now thinks you stole the bitch's coat
KEK!
His name is Cucker TuckGame he's an actor sad to say he's our version of AOC. He was likable he said a lot of things that we wanted to hear but when we really needed him he was a traitor.
Uh huh. Take this issue up again on January 21st.
The day of Salt.
As it will be known to all future generations.
I am currently considering this. Expect future op-eds like this "supporting" other MAGA warriors.
I am not letting this influence my opinion on Tucker. He went against Soros against Fox's policy, but he could have been turned after that.
I am on the wait and see side with Tucker.
Come closer, let me whisper in your ear. You know you can't trust your allies right? Hisssssssss
Yeah. It's almost as if 7 Trumpets have sounded. Tell me, how many immediate members in Trump's family?
The bar for "evidence" is set at definitive proof that can be fit into an easily digestable two minute bit. If you feel entitled to the impossible, you're a moron. Tucker should go look at a tree or something.
Judas fucking Iscariot.
The funniest part of it is the commie pub WAPO thinks we will all of a sudden read their garbage
honest question, was it just his interaction with sidney that makes us feel this way? what exactly did he do? im out of the loop apparently
He's basically implying that Sidney Powell is full of shit - he's not outright saying it, but was apparently confrontational with her and has done two shows in a row casting serious doubt on her claims.
Predictably, the media is using Tucker's soundbites to try and torpedo Trump's case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vt8cC2762E
I tuned out of Fox post election, but Tucker was always spot on IMO. I've only read here people crying about him now. I just watched this clip. Is this seriously the worst of it? He's making fair points and never says Trump is full of it, he comes across as he's always comes across. Anyone should want evidence for such a large claim like this. Sentiment around Tucker on here is ridiculous if this video is the extent of his "selling out".
Tucker's still a hell of a lot better than everyone else in the MSM and his opinion doesn't change the outcome of any court cases, I don't see why people are so upset about that. We can't afford to lose allies.
They are pissed because his quotations are being used to discredit Trump's case, and because he's making a big deal about it at a pivotal time when he doesn't have any evidence to the contrary so far.
I like Tucker, and if you see my comments above, I don't think he's part of a conspiracy, but he's really fucking up just like he did when he personally lobbied Trump to buy into lockdown nonsense.
An ally doesn't stab you in the back. An ally doesn't defend a well-known sexual deviant and pedophile aka Hunter Biden. An ally doesn't call a pedophile a "good guy with some problems." An ally doesn't concern troll and throw a patriotic lawyer under the bus simply because she refuses to hand over all of her evidence to help him lift his falling ratings. He's a piece of shit.
He defended Hunter Biden and called him a "good guy with some problems." As if defending a pedophile wasn't bad enough, he then shits on the Sidney Powell. Her reputation is sterling. We shouldn't be surprised though.. Tucker was originally a "journalist" on MSNBC and CNN before he came to FOX.
I thought it was a great article.
Username checks out
The two who downvoted didn't get the joke. SAD!
The journalist is connected to Gawker and his wife works for mother jones.
When the WaPo tells you what to do, you do the opposite.
This!
Use your brains folks. What if WaPo recommended all MAGA peeeeedes watch Steve Bannon’s War Room?
PsyOp.
They exist solely to subvert the American way of life. They wouldn't make that recommendation.
He had his chance to learn from Megyn Kelly. Viewers doesn't mean influence, unless you're dealing with boomers or the left.
So his entire audience. Ok.
Left leaning?
Calling the WaPo left leaning is like calling the 1980’s Pravda slightly socialist.
Nicely said.
The Left kill each other. "Only the strong survive". Acting like we're still in the caves, and it's what their attitudes try to do! Destroy the planet until we're all living in caves.
Who the fuck would join a Leftist system if there was no other system? Choosing fear, suffering - a literal Hell? There's only one way a Leftist system ends, and it's not with happy trails. You're not gonna burn your way into Heaven - that's the trick to go to the OTHER place.
:/
Better to die free on your own two feet than live forever begging on your knees.
Nothing to see here, Deplorable Chump. Move along... /s
Wtf is this real?
Was asking that myself.
https://archive.is/AS18U
It definitely is.
Good gawd that article is so full of excrement that we need cousin Eddy.
Wow. Now I need some brain bleach.
I want to punch this motherfucker after the first paragraph.
Article by the same writer 1 year ago
Basically confirming they flipped Tucker wtf
These people are truly soulless and shameless.
Lmao!!! Amazing find!!!
Real fake news
And you know who wrote that article? Erik Wemple. The guy Tucker made fun of for the better part of 3 years. Guess that was fake too and they were buddies all along.
My God...
LIAR!
Did you read the whole article? It’s still unabashedly anti-Tucker and mocks us for ever having listened to him. It’s only meant for his reader base to reaffirm their stance on us being oh so credulous
I just finished reading it and it's exactly how it comes off as. "Come on, idiots, this is literally the only man in the planet that bullshits you about how orange man is not bad".
Not that I'm shocked, but I'd expect this level of estrogen-fueled snark from Buzzfeed bloggers.
For sure. Everything he wrote was garbage. He's stirring the pot, saying "look - the Trumpers are turning on each other."
The Washington Post is like the soldier in animal House telling the panicking crowd "remain calm! All is well!"
ROTC cadet Chip Diller, played by Kevin Bacon.
Thank you Sir, may I have another!
I was riding in coach on a flight a few years ago, and Animal House was on the in-flight entertainment. I hadn't seen it in decades, so I started watching it.
I was in the aisle seat, and the plane was full, so there was a young lady maybe in her early twenties sitting in the center seat beside me.
I assumed all the raunchier parts would have been cut or edited out, but when it got to the scene where Bluto peeps through the sorority house window, it was uncut. That embarrassed me, so I quickly stopped the movie and watched something else.
At some point later in the flight I caught a bit of what the lady next to me was watching out of the corner of my eye, and it looked like straight-up soft porn like they used to run on Cinemax in the 1980s.
Good old Skinemax. Going to the blocked channels late at night waving an arm in the air with the feverish hope of seeing a nipple and maybe 2 boobies if only for a few seconds. The best of times.
Y'know... It's been years since I've seen that, and I seem to recall that it was Kevin Bacon... But I wasn't exactly sure!😁
BYE Tucker. And btw, we didn't bail on him. HE BAILED ON US.
He was never "on our side". Fox is and always will be controlled opposition.
Oh now Tucker stabs us in the back and suddenly people are going to pretend they always knew he was a snake lmao get real.
I think that comment can be read as reflective instead of knowing.
Fair enough. I don't think it's even true though, Tucker sold out. That doesn't mean he wasn't big for our movement.
I suspect it is possible all those things can be true. He works for the company. Believes in the words he speaks. Is "on our side" yet sold out for reasons that scare the shit out him.
Suppose he WAS recruited by intelligence for a moment. We know from the Church commission in the 70s that cia employed people in media to follow narrative. We also know they made the program voluntary instead of scrapping it.
What do you think Tucker was told or mandated when he started? "Here's the plan tucker .... you're on board? Great!" I doubt it. Compartmentalization is how you keep information from spreading. My company does it all the time to prevent leaks before products come out. He was told just enough to make him believe he was acting in his principled interests. Fox is run by Murdoch. NOT a conservative. Just a rich guy filling a market niche. Fox always has been a pawn in a sick game to control the discussion of the masses.
What do I know. Sounds like a conspiracy ...
Why? Because Sydney Powell refuses to come on his show?
Sorry but I’ve valued Tucker’s independent style for years, and I have barely heard of Sydney Powell.
First of all I said NOTHING about her, and second of all it's Sidney not Sydney.
I haven’t had the time to be on here for a few days and all of a sudden Tucker is Megyn Kelley.
I’m asking why.
Best I can tell it was because of something he said about Powell on his show.
So I went back and watched, and all he said is she made a lot of claims, we offered her unlimited time to come on the show and present evidence, and she not only refused but said stop bothering me.
Is this why ppl are mad at Tucker? I’m actually asking, and can’t find an answer.
Ok again putting words in my mouth, Tucker is not Megyn Kelley wtf? If you don't know why people are mad at Tucker than you're not paying attention, it predates whatever fued he has with Sidney. It's the fact that he has fully bought into the narrative that there isn't enough fraud to overturn the election and he is peddling that garbage to the, at one time, largest audience in all of cable news.
Pathetic. You've had dozens of examples to see Carlson's treachery, from the Kavanaugh hearing, to the fearmongering of Covid, to so much more. You're an idiot or a shill.
As an aside, what conservative reads the WP? For the lollies?
Know thy enemy
Yessir. That’s a major factor that sets us apart from liberals, gives us a major edge
Democracy Dies in Darkness is their slogan?
I think I'll pass.
Inadvertently rayciss slogan
I mean, they're not wrong, with the 4 AM ballot dumps and all.
"If you don't want your naked child laid upon the altar of Satan, you're a racist, sexist, homophobe!"
"As you wish." (cocks shotgun)
It's not a warning, it's their mission statement.
Either you've heard me say that before or we have the same brain.
Like 4 AM darkness?
Tucker lost our trust, you can't win that back. Fox is completely irrecoverably fucked.
Finally got my parents off Fox News though. All I had to do was predict exactly how the election would go. Finally they can get in touch with some real news.
Did the same with my mother-in-law. Took her to see a Trump boat parade, hundreds and hundreds of boats. Told her that the news wouldn't cover it or pretend hardly anyone participated. She didn't believe me. Sure enough, there was a 10 second blurb on local news that showed two boats. She woke up.
This is like teaching kids not to take candy from anyone named Chester.
Stop looking at the squirrel- focus pedes, FOCUS!!!
https://thedonald.win/p/11QRorefvp/
KEK!
omg SQUIRREL!1!1!
The biggest mistake Tucker made was that he thought it was about him and not the MAGA movement. The way he cheerfully said that the rumors of him leaving Fox is false and while gloating that he was actually offered more hours/programming at Fox showed me what kind of person he is.
tucker is a controlled limited hangout operation owned by the murdochs used to steer conservatives back into their slumber!
Wow so incredibly telling. He was a shill all along.
If you look at his dad, it's perfectly likely he was a shill before anyone had heard his name.
Nah, if he was Antifa wouldn't have targeted his wife.
Useful idiots are still idiots.
Holy shit, this is real? LMAO.
This is a distraction, focus on things that matter.
Exposing snakes matter.
Guys I'm gonna go point out this snake that's irrelevant, but don't worry you guys go fight the British empire. The snake is more important to waste resources and time on.
Actually, identifying influential traitors is extremely important, this must be hard for you.
Guys guys, I know we pointed out a hundred times yesterday that there's someone we don't like anymore. But I can't control myself so I'm going to keep wasting everyone's time pointing something out that's irrelevant to what's going on.
You need to grow up. You're behaving like a middle/high school kid going on and on about what someone you thought was cool said. Pay attention to what matters and stop wasting resources on irrelevant people. It's like you've never ended a relationship before, move on.
Sounds like you are just parroting Bannon's rant.
Not an argument.
Hey WAPO, we play a new game now. It's called ONE STRIKE and your out.
Lmfao! The Washington Post of all garbage news outlets too. Might as well just have Haspel herslef come out and demand we keep watching him.
Or the Hawaiian judge overturn our decision to stop watching.
Great idea: https://thedonald.win/p/11QRosmFRB/
Love it! All the upvotes!
They don't want us exposed to the likes of Greg Kelly. 1 Deplorable + 1 Deplorable = 2A.
Apparently he's trying to back pedal now but I have no interest in what he has to say and didn't watch the video lol
Why would one news outlet tell people they hate to not bail on another news outlet that they hate?
Pass.
"We invested all this time setting up controlled opposition!"
LOLWUT? I know the Tolerant Left™ gets off on ordering normal people around... but why would one of the most obvious sources of Leftist propaganda think we would take their advice on anything?
I'm pretty sure if you go back 3 weeks, the Washington Post would have been posting articles bashing Tucker Carlson as MSM always has. Now suddenly that he is seen as "helpful" by contradicting Sidney Powell they are trying to boost his ratings? CLOWN WORLD IS NO JOKE
If they aren’t listening to Tucker anymore, they sure as hell aren’t listening to WaPo
WaPo isn't just a blatant propaganda organ like Der Sturmer, although Bezos is pushing it harder than ever in that direction. WaPo has always had another, more subtle role. It's the daily cheat sheet for the left.
Amateur leftists all over America get daily talking points from the Washington Post, specifically to feed their friends and family who don't know that they read the Washington Post. That's what makes the propaganda more subtle and effective. It gets around our defenses by appearing to be common-sense reasoning from people just like us, when in reality it's anything but that.
I'm sure we all are going back to watch Cucker Tarlson after the Washington Compost tell us to do that....
https://youtu.be/YczH_Heokow
Check this out. His own words.
This is beyond the kiss of death.
It’s why I am skeptical, it’s a little too on the nose.
honk honk
Lol.. definitely time to bail.
Wow, I'm convinced to never listen to Tucker again. Wapo is quite literally the enemy
LOL WaPo defending Tucker? Oh, Wemple. Tucker's secret butt buddy if I'm not mistaken.
"Never believe anything until it is officially denied"
-- Otto von Bismarck
I love that they have "Democracy dies in darkness" under their Logo...on a black background.
Exactly what they want! They don't even hide it.
I bailed already on all things Fox News.
I feel like this is a taunt and they are taking a stab at us and tucker... didn't read the piece tho..
"Hey Bernie Bros: Don't bail on Biden!"
Noise
They call us “folks” because they think we’re dumb enough to fall for shit like this. kek
You mean the Bezos washington post wants us to boost ratings on Disney's Fox News?
That's a little weird...
Disney doesn't run Fox News.
Did Bannon give you permission to make fun of me yet?
Riiiiiiiiight... the same Washington Post, that's been a Trump hating machine for 4 years, and has been wrong on just about every issue of substance since Bezos bought it for chump change now thinks we'll take a single thing they say seriously? Self awareness score -100
"They're not following the Judas Goat. They're just milling around on the ramp. We've got an entire shift sitting around getting paid for nothing. Now, you get those sheep up the ramp right now!"
LOL. Because former Tucker watchers ever cared what WA Compost said.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/20/hey-maga-folks-dont-bail-tucker/%3foutputType=amp
This is simple reverse psychology. They want people to ditch Tucker. They have no reason to think a clear anti-Trump article on their left wing news site would motivate conservatives to give him another chance. Just the opposite, using themselves as a damaging endorsement.
Not that it's necessary. I'm not planning to watch him anymore anyway, so unfortunately I'll be granting their wish.
I don´t think they have the mental capacity for something like reverse psychology, especially not the author of that article based on the way he writes.
Me personally find that excerpt here really telling:
I think in his mind he sees Tucker as a centralized tool to lead the masses by his "honesty". Think about it, a decentralized organic community like this here is much harder to control if there is no central information source. This is exactly how they control all the other sheep, so why couldn´t it work for us?
I tell you why it couldn´t, because people here actually care about the truth and integrity. Sure, people here as well can be misled by stories and wanting-it-to-be-true bias is real but that attitude remains at its core.
Honestly fuck MSM, they should all die out already like the disfunct tools they are.