As soon as anything is filed alleging any misconduct involving any three letter agency (especially so under the earth-shaking and institution-destroying dimensions that you are going to assert) be fully prepared and expect them to run to the Court, to seek to have all your evidence sealed, redacted, and otherwise pulled from public view.
Sealed and court-redacted, under the usual fiction of "national security interests".
This is their classic cover-up tool, and you have probably seen it first hand in the past.
They will do this to keep from public view the existence and scope of their bad conduct. It will all be concealed and obscured if they get their way.
And then the media will recast it as something else to escalate the propaganda war.
Judges are unsophisticated in this area, and routinely roll over to these agencies on these requests. You must overcome this judicial presumption.
You must have the President directly and publicly intervene to override any agency national security interest claim.
And you must fight like hell to keep the assigned Judge from buying the agency contention. If what you are contending is true, the agency is a criminal actor, seeking to cover up evidence of their crimes. That should be the angle. Appeal the summary evidentiary ruling (as hard as that is), if need be. Do not accept this cover up tactic.
Otherwise, the public will never see the evidence you are claiming. They will bury it under seal and redactions.
[Header Edit and apology: Yes, I know her name is Sidney. I was operating on my first cup of coffee, and was late for an appointment, so moved too fast myself.]
Sorry commies, recent Pentagon personnel changes means that option is unavailable. Try harder.
They will try. Especially the IC goons. Don't let them succeed.
Yeah, they should simultaneously release all evidence to the public when submitting them to the court. Trump can declass anything he wants, so they would just need to coordinate.
I disagree, they need to keep it away from the media. Then the media will be forced to cover the legal victories. Info should only be released if the court is corrupt and rules in favor of the scum. Then release the info to the public so the public can see that the judge is corrupt.
You're an impressive one, centipede
Oh really? His cia director is refusing to hand over documents he ordered declassified
Kash, Miller, Ezra and the gang will see to it that the info has an open lane to pound town.
KASH MONEY
Exactly. I laugh that a mere forum dweller wants to school Sidney Powell on how to handle the deep state.
You don't know who posts here, Mr. Handshake.
I agree with you, when you said “appeal the summary evidentiary ruling” I knew you knew the law and would more than likely be an officer of the court...that’s incredibly specific language and procedural.
You didn't even spell her name right !
True, and I apologize.
First cup of coffee and in a hurry.
Sorry.
:) so everything you said ever is wrong
Your post was good and timely. Well done. Keep up the fight.
LMAO, and you clearly wield such mighty influence that you're speaking to her through a forum rather than having any direct contact.
So insignificant that you decided to inform anon.
Interesting glow
You clearly don't understand what the goal of this post is. My bet is the poster is someone pretty high up in the court system and is trying to make many keen eyes turn towards this potential issue. More voices expressing this is great because it amplifies the message to the public. The more the merrier. Otherwise it would have been spoken or sent to Sydney without anyone else being informed.
P.S.: Many higher ups batting for Trump have already credited this forum with helping dig up new info they otherwise had not found yet (maybe wouldn't have ever, time is super limited here... who knows).
I said it not to mitigate the importance of the people here and the work being done, but more because of the sheer arrogance of directing a very generic note to Sidney Powell on how to handle the deep state (as if she's not been doing it her whole career). The tl;dr of my response is "no shit, Sherlock."
Classifying things in the name of "national security" is not exactly high level insight. Anyone who watched what happened to 911 whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds realizes this.
You that anyone can post here. This guy could be former CIA, FBI or even President Trump. This place is becoming THE place for conservatives to hang out and the people posting could be anyone.
keep laughing fuck face - wtf do u know ? "mere forum dweller" - u r right, anyone who reads .win must not be able to offer advise, because they dont know anything. everyone who can offer advise would be able to pick up the phone and call her (he said with extreme sarcasm). U R A FUCKING IDIOT
Don't you know we're all internet lawyers and know what's best. Get with the program, Pede. /S Now take my measly one upvote!
This /S means sarcasm you incompetent downvoting shills!
Are you calling me a deplorable, chump? /s
I identify as a toaster
:~)
Also the President wouldnt allow it period.
She used to be a Federal prosecutor and began defending people after she saw the corruption first hand.
I think she knows, but it's a good idea to remind her just in case.
Also...Flynn. Exactly same thing going on in that case. And she got some of it declassified.
So I think she's got this.
The item with Flynn is the damn judge.
Might have judiciary interference with the current set of suits and filings.
In a less hurried world, she would certainly catch this.
But this is a fire-drill case, and people sometimes forget the hose to grab the axe.
If her team is big enough, they will have preparations. I do not know how many hands she has working with her on this one. My sense is that it is a small group, and they are likely swamped with pre-filing tasks.
If the other side can keep the most damaging and embarrassing evidence from the public, they have already won half the case.
I expect them to release everything publicly just moments before filing with the courts.
Wouldn't be surprised. In Clown World burying evidence of our elections being completely fraudulent is in our national interest, lmfao.
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.
she knows. she's seen their commie playbook.
She hasn't seen a lot of the classified version.
You don’t think they know this? Give them some credit. They are playing with the Democrats and don’t forget they have to have the people behind them and prove they followed the law and constitution. They can’t just go running in with servers and arresting people that would send the wrong narrative.
Agreed. Sidney has been at war with the deep state for years now. As an educated lawyer on top of that fact she's way more knowledgeable of their tactics than any Pede here
I assumed it was less for her and more for us.
God Bless Sidney.
This.
Prayers are very powerful tools.
After the Flynn case, I think Powell is possibly the world’s leading expert on this subject.
Alphabet bois are under the perview of the DoD now. That chain may already be broken.
Funny how Google decided to form itself under parent company Alphabet. Coincidence? Hmmm.
No, they aren't. Why do people keep saying this?
Maybe I’m mistaken? I thought this was addressed at the press conference the other day. Perhaps I misheard.
Special Operations Command was moved directly under SecDef. That doesn't do anything to other agencies.
Gotcha. Thank you for clarifying.
I'm sure she and the entire team know this (at least I hope so!), but it's good to see that others know this as well.
Powell wrote Licensed to Lie.
She knows more than she let's on.
I'm pretty sure she does, but it's nice to see that others understand what the opposition can/may/will likely try to do -- if you know what your enemy can do, you're less likely to be surprised...that goes for the supporters of the team as well!
We can only hope it's enough.
Have a good Thanksgiving 🦃 🇺🇸
I plan on it; you too!
President can declassify anything he wants, by law.
Judges have seen it all, from lying ex-spouses, to lying criminals to lying FBI agents.
OP sound like one of those people that kept saying "Nothing is HAPPENING!!!!!" at the FISA court.
There will need to be an evidentiary showing, and it must be compelling and simple. Like this:
The two links below are to the same video, on different platforms. This is evidence that could easily be converted to an exhibit and either an affidavit or witness testimony.
https://twitter.com/local_aperture/status/1329720449127780354
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1329720320555581441/pu/vid/576x1024/otU7sccslOXkrO5O.mp4?tag=10
It must be this simple.
How is she even communicating?
You know the Deep State is monitoring her phone and emails.
Burner phones?
........ interesting, the courts definitely need more oversight
These are hostile super villains were going up against so expect them to pull every evil trick in the book not limited to kidnapping families for blackmail and killing people. Its war
I get what you're saying, but Trump daddy has the power to declassify so it's a pointless gambit
So where's all that other stuff he said to declassify?
IIRC, it was released but redacted to the point of uselessness.
She is very well aware of this, as is their whole team, but still good advice.
This is a good point. There are a lot of gears turning here, and we can't let them resort to their tried and true coverup methods.
This is true and correct. I hope she's willing to break the fake law to get this done.
Lol... secret voting data? They can't be that stupid.
Trump can just order to declassify the info and fire anyone that won’t do it
MAGA2020
stay strong pedes our country depends on it
What is the FEC going to do about this? Have they no.powers?
Sure. They can create a task force to DO BETTER NEXT TIME. /s
Even if they did, the President of the United States is the final arbiter of what is and isn't classified. He is still President and he can declassify anything.
Pray for all these attorney's safety and protection. I don't want the front page filled with HER NAME WAS SIDNEY POWELL memes for the next 4 years.
And please hire private security. And stay strapped yourself.
And all this and other treason has been enabled by failure of DOJ to prosecute.
Trump declassifies 10 seconds later and it's over. They know that.
TRUMP CAN DECLASSIFY IT ALL This PRESIDENT is on our side..
Sidney (not Sydney).
Pet peeve of mine. She has done so much for us and our nation. The least we can do is learn to spell her name right.
You're right and I apologize.
One cup of coffee and heading out the door.
I'm sure she would normally be aware of this. But she is moving 1,000 MPH right now.
Assembling a case like this usually requires 3-6 months. She has 2-3 weeks.
The Internet is a strange beast. Whether you're a constitutional scholar, or 12 year old on their parent's tablet, the users have updooted you high enough to be on the front page.
It doesn't verify that you're anything more than a random person on the internet, but it does show a plurality agree with you.
I’m not trying to get on the front page.
I’m just passing along some well-oiled opinions and observations to a colleague. One under incredible pressure. And that’s all it is, opinion. I’m not larping, and am not presenting any fanciful new facts. Most are things a good federal practitioner would be aware of under normal circumstances. Or perhaps not. And these are not usual circumstances. It’s what I would mention to a partner walking down the hall.
You all can consider it however you like. I laid out what I think they are going to try. It may succeed. It may fail. No harm in speaking it.
Consider me the old retired man that lives in the dilapidated house on the corner. I’m not that important at this particular point.
Kag: on the specific issue of spelling, you should be aware that DJT frequently inserts deliberate spelling errors in his tweets as a tactic to induce gullible liberals to spread the message. They retweet it with some smug remark like "OMG He's so stoooooooooopid!!!" and then the information content of the message is seen by 500 more people.
4d chess.
Pretty sure powell knows their tricks better than anyone lol.
Thankfully, all classification authority rests with the President.
A reasonable argument, but Ms Powell and company are not neophytes.
The complaint will be given to gnews or same type. Seal it but leaks sometimes happen winkwink
If only there was someone at the top of the chain who can BTFO all of this BS.
She needs to make her proof public. Get it out in the public domain. Once it is out in the world, there is no stopping it or covering it up.
She must assume that the entire government is a bad actor in this and will do anything to muffle this evidence.
Get it all into the hands of the public. Make it common knowledge. GO NUCLEAR with the evidence. Then there is no stopping it.
It will force moderate democrats who are clinging to their party to admit that the crazy progressives are in charge and will come for them the first opportunity they get once the transition is in place.
I can only tell you I correctly identified the defensive argument that the en banc Circuit Court of Appeals panel would rely on to rule against Ms. Powell's Petition for Mandamus in the Flynn case (justiciable ripeness), before she even filed her Petition. If you choose to not believe that, that is up to you. I really don't care.
I also recommended -- here -- that the two Republican Board Members in Wayne County withdraw their coerced certification votes and submit Affidavits detailing the coercion and duress. They did so the next day. You can search for that one here.
What Ms. Powell is attempting is an enormous undertaking, in an extraordinarily compressed time frame. She is swamped with initial investigation tasks, the legal research underpinning the claim platform, and pleading preparations. Sometimes, even the very best litigator has to move so fast that second stage considerations take a back seat. Exigencies.
This will likely be among the first defensive moves. And one that could prove quite undermining.
Again, you do not know who posts here, who reads here, and who lurks here.
I find it curious that some folks feel the need to deride you and your post, even criticizing the misspelling of Sidney. Sounds like msm going after Rudy's hair dye or whatever the fuck that was about. You could be larping or not, but your cautionary post is still valid. And you seem to have experience in the legal arena, so why not give you the benefit of the doubt. Or not, but at least stfu and not attempt to sow discord or alienate a fellow pede who might actually have some valuable contributions.
Pay no attention to the doomers. Thank you for your input. No matter what your professional standing and level of expertise, advice and reminders from a colleague are always valuable. MAGA