As soon as anything is filed alleging any misconduct involving any three letter agency (especially so under the earth-shaking and institution-destroying dimensions that you are going to assert) be fully prepared and expect them to run to the Court, to seek to have all your evidence sealed, redacted, and otherwise pulled from public view.
Sealed and court-redacted, under the usual fiction of "national security interests".
This is their classic cover-up tool, and you have probably seen it first hand in the past.
They will do this to keep from public view the existence and scope of their bad conduct. It will all be concealed and obscured if they get their way.
And then the media will recast it as something else to escalate the propaganda war.
Judges are unsophisticated in this area, and routinely roll over to these agencies on these requests. You must overcome this judicial presumption.
You must have the President directly and publicly intervene to override any agency national security interest claim.
And you must fight like hell to keep the assigned Judge from buying the agency contention. If what you are contending is true, the agency is a criminal actor, seeking to cover up evidence of their crimes. That should be the angle. Appeal the summary evidentiary ruling (as hard as that is), if need be. Do not accept this cover up tactic.
Otherwise, the public will never see the evidence you are claiming. They will bury it under seal and redactions.
[Header Edit and apology: Yes, I know her name is Sidney. I was operating on my first cup of coffee, and was late for an appointment, so moved too fast myself.]
She used to be a Federal prosecutor and began defending people after she saw the corruption first hand.
I think she knows, but it's a good idea to remind her just in case.
Also...Flynn. Exactly same thing going on in that case. And she got some of it declassified.
So I think she's got this.
The item with Flynn is the damn judge.
Might have judiciary interference with the current set of suits and filings.
In a less hurried world, she would certainly catch this.
But this is a fire-drill case, and people sometimes forget the hose to grab the axe.
If her team is big enough, they will have preparations. I do not know how many hands she has working with her on this one. My sense is that it is a small group, and they are likely swamped with pre-filing tasks.
If the other side can keep the most damaging and embarrassing evidence from the public, they have already won half the case.
I expect them to release everything publicly just moments before filing with the courts.