As soon as anything is filed alleging any misconduct involving any three letter agency (especially so under the earth-shaking and institution-destroying dimensions that you are going to assert) be fully prepared and expect them to run to the Court, to seek to have all your evidence sealed, redacted, and otherwise pulled from public view.
Sealed and court-redacted, under the usual fiction of "national security interests".
This is their classic cover-up tool, and you have probably seen it first hand in the past.
They will do this to keep from public view the existence and scope of their bad conduct. It will all be concealed and obscured if they get their way.
And then the media will recast it as something else to escalate the propaganda war.
Judges are unsophisticated in this area, and routinely roll over to these agencies on these requests. You must overcome this judicial presumption.
You must have the President directly and publicly intervene to override any agency national security interest claim.
And you must fight like hell to keep the assigned Judge from buying the agency contention. If what you are contending is true, the agency is a criminal actor, seeking to cover up evidence of their crimes. That should be the angle. Appeal the summary evidentiary ruling (as hard as that is), if need be. Do not accept this cover up tactic.
Otherwise, the public will never see the evidence you are claiming. They will bury it under seal and redactions.
[Header Edit and apology: Yes, I know her name is Sidney. I was operating on my first cup of coffee, and was late for an appointment, so moved too fast myself.]
I can only tell you I correctly identified the defensive argument that the en banc Circuit Court of Appeals panel would rely on to rule against Ms. Powell's Petition for Mandamus in the Flynn case (justiciable ripeness), before she even filed her Petition. If you choose to not believe that, that is up to you. I really don't care.
I also recommended -- here -- that the two Republican Board Members in Wayne County withdraw their coerced certification votes and submit Affidavits detailing the coercion and duress. They did so the next day. You can search for that one here.
What Ms. Powell is attempting is an enormous undertaking, in an extraordinarily compressed time frame. She is swamped with initial investigation tasks, the legal research underpinning the claim platform, and pleading preparations. Sometimes, even the very best litigator has to move so fast that second stage considerations take a back seat. Exigencies.
This will likely be among the first defensive moves. And one that could prove quite undermining.
Again, you do not know who posts here, who reads here, and who lurks here.
I find it curious that some folks feel the need to deride you and your post, even criticizing the misspelling of Sidney. Sounds like msm going after Rudy's hair dye or whatever the fuck that was about. You could be larping or not, but your cautionary post is still valid. And you seem to have experience in the legal arena, so why not give you the benefit of the doubt. Or not, but at least stfu and not attempt to sow discord or alienate a fellow pede who might actually have some valuable contributions.
Pay no attention to the doomers. Thank you for your input. No matter what your professional standing and level of expertise, advice and reminders from a colleague are always valuable. MAGA