I don't agree about his value. He shares a handful of facts legacy media can't use to their advantage then pads his show and preens with false humility. He was tolerable but not a treasure. If anything his story stands as a warning about the consequences of hubris.
In what sense though? Talking with feeling? Tuck was never an investigative journalist. He made talking points out of other people's work. Try to watch his show now. You get blueballed waiting for him to break a fraction of what you already know
Tucker is still the best out there. Sometimes the hardest gangsters slip on wet grass and look foolish.
I don't agree about his value. He shares a handful of facts legacy media can't use to their advantage then pads his show and preens with false humility. He was tolerable but not a treasure. If anything his story stands as a warning about the consequences of hubris.
Who is better?
In what sense though? Talking with feeling? Tuck was never an investigative journalist. He made talking points out of other people's work. Try to watch his show now. You get blueballed waiting for him to break a fraction of what you already know
For all of those talking heads on TV, he is the best of the bunch.