There is never going to be an election where we have MORE evidence of voter fraud than this one.
If we can not stop it this time then nothing will ever prove voter fraud.
It is not like democrat states are going to give us the servers and machines and say here, do your diagnostics to look for fraud.
They don't even want us to look for signature matches. It is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to prove voter fraud if you have no way to inspect for voter fraud.
The supreme court has to understand that and I think they will
The SCOTUS does not act, or is not SUPPOSED to act from political pressure. If the SCOTUS makes a ruling on this election it will HAVE to come from an issue of Constitutionality. Gore v Bush comes in to play possibly big time as that laid down the foundation that any different treatments of classes of voters is dilutive to one of those groups. In THIS case (GA) mail-in voters faces LESS scrutiny than in-person voters.
Also, the issue of the GA Legislature being the only body with the authority to change election laws in GA is an issue since the SOS reached a consent agreement with the GA democrat party that changed the voting process. Raffensberger had no authority to do that.