There is never going to be an election where we have MORE evidence of voter fraud than this one.
If we can not stop it this time then nothing will ever prove voter fraud.
It is not like democrat states are going to give us the servers and machines and say here, do your diagnostics to look for fraud.
They don't even want us to look for signature matches. It is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to prove voter fraud if you have no way to inspect for voter fraud.
The supreme court has to understand that and I think they will
I think Trump will win, but it's hard imagining what the specific ruling will be declared that grants him that. The ruling wouldn't be "Trump wins" but rather, "we rule the states must follow x,y,z" with an effect that enforcing those judgments will result in his winning.
So, is it declaring all votes received after Nov 3 invalid? Is it mandating the states to nullify ballots that weren't properly observed? If fraud is found in the voting machines, how does the court determine which ballots were legal? It'll be interesting seeing how this shakes out from a legal standpoint.
US v Throckmorton