2555
Comments (33)
sorted by:
120
deleted 120 points ago +120 / -0
56
Meatbank84 56 points ago +56 / -0

It’s so gratifying watching that high they had thinking they got rid of Trump slowly turn into their nightmare. I can’t fucking wait for when it’s official. It’s gonna be a salt blizzard this winter.

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +16 / -3
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
16
Afeazo 16 points ago +16 / -0

“It’s like in a movie when the monster just died and there’s still 20 minute left in the run time”

2
icecoldmax 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol! I said this to someone the other day and they said “it’s not like a monster movie because the damage to equality, institutions and democracy is REAL. There is skin in the game!”

And I was like “oh, damage to democracy you say?”

1
ClokworkGremlin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, he's not wrong, but probably not the way he thinks. BLM has set racial tension back more than 30 years.

16
Itiswrittenkjv1611 16 points ago +16 / -0

everyone will have plus one vote from me pede

10
Saigunx 10 points ago +10 / -0

When you leave reddit because they shut down T_D, but they follow us here, see the mountains of evidence and research and have the audacity to downvote pedes. The TDS is real. Fucking political tribalism dude.

2
Magamenow 2 points ago +2 / -0

And no fruit cup.

60
MAGAA2020isback 60 points ago +63 / -3

To be clear, it's his assessment after seeing all of the same stuff (namely, affidavits) that we're seeing. He's not privy to any new knowledge or insights directly shared to him by Trump.

Still worth reading, though.

24
bytemuncher 24 points ago +24 / -0

After reading just 5% of the evidence here I came to the same conclusion as he did.

https://hereistheevidence.com

2
2018ExecutiveOrder 2 points ago +11 / -9

Yeah I'd like to add before anyone gets their hopes up I don't think sidney has some major smoking gun like the servers or anything like that unfortunately

I think Sidney's case is strong but not to the point where it's so undeniable that see have concrete proof of obama, clinton, soros involved etc

Maybe at best she has whistleblowers with text logs and such

That being said I'm very confident in the constitutional cases in PA and GA. Add in the fact that MI refuses to certify and we go into a house vote where trump wins.

I'm a little disappointed because this would make even liberals accepting of the truth. We're so divided though so who the fuck cares at this point

-8
deleted -8 points ago +9 / -17
7
2018ExecutiveOrder 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think the stronger evidence will be used in court, it's standard practice to never show your hand in public but like I said I don't think that will be any smoking gun

As with the lawsuits we have, they are very sound. Particularly in Georgia and Pennsylvania as they are constitutional cases (secretary of states usurped election law prior to the election). And we have clarence thomas overseeing the lawsuit in georgia, Alito in PA. Unless they are part of the swap, I see no reason why they would deny the remedy in both cases which is throwing out a considerable amount of unlawful ballots.

This is our ticket.

3
kyblugrass 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm with you on this. A lot of people want see Justice done and hope this is some sort of masterstroke that will bring it all down. People keep losing sight of what is more important, keeping Trump in the White House, and I hope her evidence demonstrates fraud in a way that it invalidates Bidens claim of victory.

3
Litecola2 3 points ago +3 / -0

YOU CANNOT FILE AGAINST ELECTION FRAUD IN COURT UNTIL THE RESULTS ARE "CERTIFIED" BY THE STATE.

YOU NEVER PRESENT EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC THAT YOU PLAN TO USE IN COURT, BECAUSE 1) THE OTHER SIDE CAN PREP 2) THE JUDGE MAY TOSS IT

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
42
deleted 42 points ago +43 / -1 (edited)
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
20
Tucso 20 points ago +22 / -2

It was a pleasant read. They are going to prove hundreds of affidavits wrong?

5
Error404 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hundreds of pages that corroborate... if none of them were linked or supported one another, one would think that'd be easier to debunk. But I think we all know we have the truth and facts on our side.

11
ravonaf 11 points ago +11 / -0

And water is wet.

7
CyberCriminaI 7 points ago +7 / -0

aCtUaLlY!

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
skiduzzlebutt 3 points ago +4 / -1

"from 2016 though, sorry guys we're a bit behind!"

3
Georgiatechnician 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why is this not on stickied!?

1
VetforTrump2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we just start eradicating them now