I think the public relations is critical to the case in this way.
Pre-2020 we had the following in America, and this is the way judges would rule:
"If you can't prove voter fraud, we assume the elections are secure."
I think the trump legal team is working to change that by making the idea that fraud may have occurred so popular that the American people lose faith in elections, so that the judges will say,
"If you can't prove that the vote is secure and valid, then we assume that it is compromised and we throw it out."
i think Q is bullshit but in the end i dont care what Sidney believes as long she got something that holds up in court
I am with you. It all seems so crazy. But so many credible people are jumping on this.
I keep thinking maybe they are just doing it to throw enough doubt in the process to get to the electors.
That or everyone is saying they heard it rumors and everyone thinks they are hearing that person confirm the rumor.
Ultimately it would be so cool if this is true.
I think the public relations is critical to the case in this way.
Pre-2020 we had the following in America, and this is the way judges would rule:
"If you can't prove voter fraud, we assume the elections are secure."
I think the trump legal team is working to change that by making the idea that fraud may have occurred so popular that the American people lose faith in elections, so that the judges will say,
"If you can't prove that the vote is secure and valid, then we assume that it is compromised and we throw it out."
Huge difference.