I think the public relations is critical to the case in this way.
Pre-2020 we had the following in America, and this is the way judges would rule:
"If you can't prove voter fraud, we assume the elections are secure."
I think the trump legal team is working to change that by making the idea that fraud may have occurred so popular that the American people lose faith in elections, so that the judges will say,
"If you can't prove that the vote is secure and valid, then we assume that it is compromised and we throw it out."
I think the public relations is critical to the case in this way.
Pre-2020 we had the following in America, and this is the way judges would rule:
"If you can't prove voter fraud, we assume the elections are secure."
I think the trump legal team is working to change that by making the idea that fraud may have occurred so popular that the American people lose faith in elections, so that the judges will say,
"If you can't prove that the vote is secure and valid, then we assume that it is compromised and we throw it out."
Huge difference.