Has the Donald been flooded with feds trying to trap people into saying stupid shit? Is everyone getting gaslit with feds all talking to each other amping each other up? I can’t tell anymore. What’s real and what’s fake. Tucker flipping to the other side. Etc.
If Trump provides serious evidence of fraud through his legal team, a strong reaction is warranted. But don’t we have to see what’s in the legal documents they’re filing first?
These posts are publicly visible. I don’t know how anonymous they are. This is probably what it was like to be under constant surveillance like it was for those in the Soviet Union unwillingly.
The first step is for mass civil protests to be tried. The French yellow vests are a good example of that. The Ukrainian maidan revolution was another example. Hong Kong protests being a third. Large scale protests can be effective. Covid may be used as an excuse to crack down on protests, but peaceful civil disobedience is the first step.
Also, look to apps that were used in the Hong Kong protests and learn from that. They’re good for peer to peer comms. Though who knows, maybe the CIA made all of them as part of their counter-Chinese strategy.
The organizer was an Obama fanboy who did slam poetry about "white devils."
I can almost guarantee you've never heard about the man who admitted on tape, in a college lecture, to pointing a rifle at the car before the driver took off into the crowd. I've seen the video, but good luck finding it.
I'm talking in the sense that all else has failed, after protesting and all that shit. I'm not a fed but I would imagine at this point the feds wouldn't be encouraging resistance. They be encouraging submission because they know how pissed we all are, and at them. They are the ones on this website calling anyone who posts about armed resistance as 'glowies'. just my guess though.
Sure, but on the other hand, if they succeed, they will want a casus belli to persecute their opponents with harsh consequences. Think reprisals against the Ukrainians after the bolshiveks took hold, or how the Chinese communists targeted the conservative segment of Chinese society when they took power. I just feel like with anonymous online forums, there’s all sorts of fake accounts that post calls to violence that the left then uses as evidence or to support their case (when it’s a literal digital false flag). And then there’s those that want to get us to say something stupid online so they can persecute us. I don’t have guns, but, for example, online commentary may be used as a justification to disarm you. What’s more important, having the weapons at a time of need or conflict, or talking about what you’d be willing to do. At least, that would be my calculus. I may be more paranoid than necessary. PTSD from living amongst large groups of democrats who hate conservatives.
Has the Donald been flooded with feds trying to trap people into saying stupid shit? Is everyone getting gaslit with feds all talking to each other amping each other up? I can’t tell anymore. What’s real and what’s fake. Tucker flipping to the other side. Etc.
If Trump provides serious evidence of fraud through his legal team, a strong reaction is warranted. But don’t we have to see what’s in the legal documents they’re filing first?
These posts are publicly visible. I don’t know how anonymous they are. This is probably what it was like to be under constant surveillance like it was for those in the Soviet Union unwillingly.
The first step is for mass civil protests to be tried. The French yellow vests are a good example of that. The Ukrainian maidan revolution was another example. Hong Kong protests being a third. Large scale protests can be effective. Covid may be used as an excuse to crack down on protests, but peaceful civil disobedience is the first step.
Also, look to apps that were used in the Hong Kong protests and learn from that. They’re good for peer to peer comms. Though who knows, maybe the CIA made all of them as part of their counter-Chinese strategy.
If you've been around long enough you'd know they've been pulling this shit since Charlottesville. Which was a glow-op gone awry.
What’s the theory there? How did it go awry from their perspective?
The organizer was an Obama fanboy who did slam poetry about "white devils."
I can almost guarantee you've never heard about the man who admitted on tape, in a college lecture, to pointing a rifle at the car before the driver took off into the crowd. I've seen the video, but good luck finding it.
I'm talking in the sense that all else has failed, after protesting and all that shit. I'm not a fed but I would imagine at this point the feds wouldn't be encouraging resistance. They be encouraging submission because they know how pissed we all are, and at them. They are the ones on this website calling anyone who posts about armed resistance as 'glowies'. just my guess though.
Sure, but on the other hand, if they succeed, they will want a casus belli to persecute their opponents with harsh consequences. Think reprisals against the Ukrainians after the bolshiveks took hold, or how the Chinese communists targeted the conservative segment of Chinese society when they took power. I just feel like with anonymous online forums, there’s all sorts of fake accounts that post calls to violence that the left then uses as evidence or to support their case (when it’s a literal digital false flag). And then there’s those that want to get us to say something stupid online so they can persecute us. I don’t have guns, but, for example, online commentary may be used as a justification to disarm you. What’s more important, having the weapons at a time of need or conflict, or talking about what you’d be willing to do. At least, that would be my calculus. I may be more paranoid than necessary. PTSD from living amongst large groups of democrats who hate conservatives.
If they aren't doing sneak-and-peeks when you're out of town, you aren't memeing hard enough