4575
Comments (328)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
Bonami -1 points ago +2 / -3

My concern is equipment, logistics, weapons. China has a two million man army, land some portion of that in CA, WA, they would be formidable.

I can see us pulling the numbers, there are 18 million veterans in all, it is the weapons and logistics that I worry about, that is where they numbers could take us down.

I prefer to be wrong....

5
80960KA 5 points ago +5 / -0

China is having problems fighting India right on their own border. Don't believe the hype about China's military capabilities in general, let alone their capability (or total lack there of) of fighting a land war in America.

The biggest strength China has vs us is the number of corrupt politicians around the world that would like to appoint China for a turn as the new worldwide economic leader. Werewolves come right at you with teeth and claws, vampires just wait till you go to sleep and suck you dry. The globalist cabal are vampires.

2
Iosevus 2 points ago +2 / -0

This! Not to mention China would have to be able to survive crossing the pacific to land troops. And as far as the UN, I still can’t figure out why everyone looses their shit about UN forces. They are trash. The only thing they are good at is raping unarmed villages.

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

I totally agree, my suggestion that they would show up is based on more than half of the US believing they were here to "help."

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

All good points :)

0
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 0 points ago +1 / -1

You’re talking about fighting a civil war and say “there are a lot of military contractors”. Who? Which ones? What would the help provide and when? How much? These are kinda important questions that need to be answered if a civil war is possibly going to break out I. 2 months or so, wouldn’t you say?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Bramage 3 points ago +3 / -0

And degenerate china has ZERO amphibious capability and is completely unable to project its logistics. Amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics.

As for the loser UN "forces", they would be made up largely of cucked unmotivated light forces, no threat.

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know a bit about it, probably just enough to make the wrong assumptions :)

My concern is that some portion of the US military leadership is compromised, they may decide the Reset is the future. Some may view Nancy's and co hypothetical claims that Trump is a usurper as true.

1
yourheadasplode 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have any idea how difficult that would be for china? Do you really think the US Navy would stand idly by while a foreign country landed millions of troops on our land?

A single US submarine could sink the entire fucking chinese navy.

It would be comical to see China try this.

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is not a question of what they would do if faced with an invasion, they would be under the understanding that the UN and China were there to help.

Half of the country today thinks Biden won, the military has already said they will not intervene, cannot you see the possibility that if Nancy and company declared Trump unlawful and asked the UN (China is part of the UN Peace mission) to intervene that a great many would support that?

It is how coups are done. Would it work, maybe not, but just because the capability is there doesn't mean it cannot or would not be under commands to allow them in.