1669
Comments (103)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
Sargentpilcher 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm curious as to why not? Are CIA above the Supreme Court?

22
FitOfficial 22 points ago +22 / -0

I don't think anybody on the Supreme Court has the courage to stand up to the threats the CIA will put on them and their families.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
1
Leave_The_Kids_Alone 1 point ago +1 / -0

clearance is probably the only person. maybe Gorsuch

1
CornandSoybeans 1 point ago +1 / -0

Having courage to stand up to the CIA is not uncommon. There are several million that will stand up to them if need be.

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

For what its worth, they were chosen because they do have that courage just as Trump and his family do. As AG Barr said. "everybody dies". Some believe that death isn't fatal and act accordingly.

17
deleted 17 points ago +18 / -1
10
Sargentpilcher 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm all in on the idea that CIA is a rogue agency, but they are indeed accountable to the president are they not? Why would they have to kill Kennedy if he posed no threat? They killed him because they were accountable to him. Or am I missing something.

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
4
liberpede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Information is power. The intelligence apparatus of the United States controls more information, by many orders of magnitude, than any entity in the history of the planet.

What on earth makes you think the globalists don't report to the CIA?

2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they work for him then how the hell have they resisted handing over and declassifying documents that POTUS ordered them to months ago.

They have gone rogue.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
2
BigIronBigIron 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Supreme Court is an ephemeral institution, a convenient contrivance, a charade.

The REAL "supreme" court is nature itself, the law of the jungle. And what's the number one rule in the jungle?

2
CornandSoybeans 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eat or be eaten.