The Smartmatic software had the same time-stamp mismatch in 2010 Philippines election that we had in TX. So this could be a boon. Smartmatic isn't an election company, its THE election company.
Wow, my first comment is this seems to be way more complicated than it needs to be...more complicated = more chances / places for fraud...My second observation is that a lot of the discrepancies reported seem to me to be careless coding practices, not something you would expect of a professional develpers who take their job seriously...I would see if this is more of what I would expect if this was out sourced.
It has all the documents and results of election voting auditing in Los Angeles, South Carolina, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota with Ranked Choice Voting, Maryland State Board of Elections.
In the January exam, during adjudication of the ballots in
the test election, one of the Dominion representatives made a series of mistakes that caused the entire batch of adjudication results to be lost.
The ballot-marking devices incorrectly informed voters that
they were casting their ballots, when in fact they were only printing them. The ballots are not be counted until they were scanned on a different device.
The Smartmatic software had the same time-stamp mismatch in 2010 Philippines election that we had in TX. So this could be a boon. Smartmatic isn't an election company, its THE election company.
I think with this data anybody can decode the format on the card readers and change it. https://github.com/brainv/SAES/blob/b080da7296f736a5ecc9221946233dcb99a243d6/saes/src/Voting/VotingDevice/card-data-wrapper.cc
Here is also a security audit: https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/LAC/vsap2-sw.pdf
Their most recent code uses Go lang.
Wow, my first comment is this seems to be way more complicated than it needs to be...more complicated = more chances / places for fraud...My second observation is that a lot of the discrepancies reported seem to me to be careless coding practices, not something you would expect of a professional develpers who take their job seriously...I would see if this is more of what I would expect if this was out sourced.
Nice find.
Here is a contract with the state of Colorado that has been recently scrubbed or removed. https://web.archive.org/web/20201108122914/https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/RFI/proposals/DominionVotingSystemsColoradoUVSProposal.pdf
Contains an image of a System High-Level Block Diagram which indicates how the whole system functions together.
Dominion voting systems patents https://patents.justia.com/assignee/dominion-voting-systems-inc
Here is some more: https://github.com/pablotrujillo/SmartcardModuleEclipse
Colorado contract that has been recently scrubbed or moved.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201108122914/https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/VotingSystems/RFI/proposals/DominionVotingSystemsColoradoUVSProposal.pdf
High-level block diagram: https://imgur.com/a/8ppUlD9
Here is the election auditing consulting firm: https://fcmconsulting.com/300f0-portfolio/
It has all the documents and results of election voting auditing in Los Angeles, South Carolina, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota with Ranked Choice Voting, Maryland State Board of Elections.
Dominion qualification test from FL https://dos.myflorida.com/media/703575/dominion-democracy-suite-release-41437-version-3-test-report.pdf Texas: https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/forms/sysexam/oct2019-sneeringer.pdf
Santa Clara paid over $7 million for Dominion. Because paper ballot counting is so hard..
Here is the contract and it contains full cost and $3 million discount.. https://www.sccgov.org/sites/rov/Documents/CW2232168%20Dominion%20Final.pdf
"Allows staff to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images"