Re: “I think you look very hard for meaning that isn't there”
Funnily enough, and maybe I’m crazy but I often feel like people are trying really hard to ignore stuff that doesn’t seem random at all.
It may indeed be just random noise. But I think you’d have a much better case for that if there weren’t clearly some monumentally epic shit going down at the moment, the details of which we seem only dimly privy to. (which is why it all seems like so much silence and tick tocks to us)
Genuinely curious... are you referring to me or you? Wouldn’t Occam’s razor imply that when a serious woman discussing serious issues references a mythological creature, she’s trying to make a mythological reference or at least alluding to epic events? (as opposed to being cute or just “thinking it was cool” as you implied with the tattoo analogy)
So when trump says “invisible enemy” instead of “virus” while the entire nation both politically and economically tilts in the balance it violates Occam’s razor to think he might have made the decision to reference it that way deliberately?
In other words it violates Occam’s razor to think that trump was choosing his words deliberately and actually meant the words he repeatedly chose on multiple occasions?
Typhon is the many headed serpent. (like the criminal cabal we are up against is also)
Father of monsters in Greek mythology. Associated with Set in Egyptian mythology.
Typhon... I wonder if they are aware of that when they say a “storm is coming” (typhoon?)
Trump referring to the “virus” (socialist contagion?) as “the invisible enemy”...
And how Sidney said she would “release the Kraken”... dont know if the Kraken fought Typhon or anything like that (doubt it, it seems like separate mythologies) or if she’s just sending a message as general mythological counterpoint to those in the know, but I doubt she was just being “cute”.
Didn’t Giuliani say “there are no coincidences”?
Is it just me or does it feel like there are a lot of coded messages being thrown around?
Re: “I think you look very hard for meaning that isn't there”
Funnily enough, and maybe I’m crazy but I often feel like people are trying really hard to ignore stuff that doesn’t seem random at all.
It may indeed be just random noise. But I think you’d have a much better case for that if there weren’t clearly some monumentally epic shit going down at the moment, the details of which we seem only dimly privy to. (which is why it all seems like so much silence and tick tocks to us)
May the new sun come. The concilliator will revive our dying earth.
I think you look very hard for meaning that isn't there.
Not necessarily. Were I GEOTUS with a desperate swamp all around me, I would command my troops by tweets using pre-identified code strings.
If Twitter bans Trump, he'll need everyone in the loop to have burner phones.
Okay.
Not every tatoo of a rabbit on a girl's shoulder leads to wonderland.
Sometimes she just thought it looked cool.
Not saying it's so, I'm just not ready to dismiss it out of hand.
Re: “Not every tatoo of a rabbit on a girl's shoulder leads to wonderland. Sometimes she just thought it looked cool.“
Sometimes. But one thing is for sure, we’re through the looking glass now. And if you don’t believe that you aren’t paying attention.
Politics are like icebergs. The bulk of it is not above the waterline.
Some people choose not to just discard Occam's Razor. Some choose to smelt it down to slag so they can never use it again.
Genuinely curious... are you referring to me or you? Wouldn’t Occam’s razor imply that when a serious woman discussing serious issues references a mythological creature, she’s trying to make a mythological reference or at least alluding to epic events? (as opposed to being cute or just “thinking it was cool” as you implied with the tattoo analogy)
Who’s smelting the razor here?
The one suggesting that imbeded within Trump's straight forward public tweets are hidden messages to decipher.
So when trump says “invisible enemy” instead of “virus” while the entire nation both politically and economically tilts in the balance it violates Occam’s razor to think he might have made the decision to reference it that way deliberately?
In other words it violates Occam’s razor to think that trump was choosing his words deliberately and actually meant the words he repeatedly chose on multiple occasions?
I don’t think you understand Occam’s razor.
Typhon is the many headed serpent. (like the criminal cabal we are up against is also)
Father of monsters in Greek mythology. Associated with Set in Egyptian mythology.
Typhon... I wonder if they are aware of that when they say a “storm is coming” (typhoon?)
Trump referring to the “virus” (socialist contagion?) as “the invisible enemy”...
And how Sidney said she would “release the Kraken”... dont know if the Kraken fought Typhon or anything like that (doubt it, it seems like separate mythologies) or if she’s just sending a message as general mythological counterpoint to those in the know, but I doubt she was just being “cute”.
Didn’t Giuliani say “there are no coincidences”?
Is it just me or does it feel like there are a lot of coded messages being thrown around?