539
Comments (26)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
15
WallaceBeamfire 15 points ago +15 / -0

Unfortunately, sources reporting on clandestine Military operations must remain anonymous. If they did not, they would never be sources again. Please note that Adam Housley is reporting the same thing:

https://twitter.com/adamhousley/status/1330214122508718085

I also dislike anonymous sources and will withhold judgment. Things are getting interesting though.

9
bytemuncher 9 points ago +9 / -0

Housley has always been legit

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
UndercoverCentipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bingo. Well said

5
iIndianaJones 5 points ago +5 / -0

She said National Security Source, that’s not an anonymous source. Anonymous sources are anonymous, period. Emerald is giving us some information, just not providing the name of her source. If I had to guess, someone in Defense Intelligence or NSA.

4
Cicicici 4 points ago +4 / -0

anonymous, period

“An anonymous source familiar with the way the orange man thinks”

3
iIndianaJones 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ha! Yes. He prefers 2 scoops, and makes sure that everyone else only gets one. 👌🏻