6948
Comments (371)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
393
take-no-part [S] 393 points ago +393 / -0

WATCH THE FIRST MINUTE

STRONG EVIDENCE OF FRAUD

  • Biden's lead in Georgia is only 12,781 votes.

  • This analysis is based on official timestamped election night data from Edison Research which was obtained from the NYT website.

  • This batch of 23,487 votes went, at an absolute minimum accounting for all decimal places, 97.9779% for Biden.

  • This batch was uploaded at 12:18AM EST on Nov 4 (election results began the evening of Nov 3).

  • This is not a case of updating one candidate at a time; we can see from looking at the surrounding batches that Trump did not receive any corresponding entries.

  • According to official data released by the state of Georgia, the county in which Biden received the highest percentage of total absentee by mail votes was Dekalb County at 86.39%.

  • That makes this batch of votes extremely suspect, even if every single allowance is made with the minimum number of votes gained and assuming it's 100% mail in from the most heavily D county.

The ballots that comprised this batch should and must be obtained and independently audited (i.e. not by city officials) as soon as possible.

Nine witnesses of the recently completed Georgia audit including at least one registered Democrat swore to have seen suspiciously pristine, uncreased mail ballots, uniformly and perfectly filled out, almost always for Biden. In one case, a batch of such ballots included 500 ballots in a row all cast for Biden. Is there a relation?

99
LyinBiden 99 points ago +99 / -0

I'm curious, has anyone on the left been able to provide an even semi-plausible excuse for why this isn't evidence of fraud? What's the default NPC line when confronted with this?

56
WWG1WGA 56 points ago +59 / -3

The default line would be "Oh yeah, I'm going to trust some random dude using excel. God you Drumpftards are stupid "