The statistical results for mail-in ballots was ridiculous, beyond statistically improbable. The election was probably stolen in a variety of ways; tampering with voting machines, dead people voting, adding illegitimate voters to the rolls on election night, changing electronic vote totals, preventing poll-watchers from viewing, etc, etc. but the NUMBER #1 source was definitely mail-in votes. If you were going to rig an election, you'd push for extensive mail-in voting. Why? It gives you plenty of time to rig up how many ballots you need. It gives you time to throw out the opposition's ballots. The chain of custody for these ballots passes through the US Postal Service -- which by the way endorsed Joe Biden!
The only question is: what fraud will be figured out before states are certified in the electoral college? Probably not enough. Unfortunately the true significance of fraud probably won't be known for years. My own estimate is that there is at an unexplainable difference of 250K votes in PA alone.
The statistical results for mail-in ballots was ridiculous, beyond statistically improbable. The election was probably stolen in a variety of ways; tampering with voting machines, dead people voting, adding illegitimate voters to the rolls on election night, changing electronic vote totals, preventing poll-watchers from viewing, etc, etc. but the NUMBER #1 source was definitely mail-in votes. If you were going to rig an election, you'd push for extensive mail-in voting. Why? It gives you plenty of time to rig up how many ballots you need. It gives you time to throw out the opposition's ballots. The chain of custody for these ballots passes through the US Postal Service -- which by the way endorsed Joe Biden!
The only question is: what fraud will be figured out before states are certified in the electoral college? Probably not enough. Unfortunately the true significance of fraud probably won't be known for years. My own estimate is that there is at an unexplainable difference of 250K votes in PA alone.