6948
Comments (371)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
121
Paul_Revere 121 points ago +121 / -0

What's the default NPC line when confronted with this?

Probably along the lines of "Hahahaha, Drumph is just a sore loser conspiracy theorist. And you're a Nazi!"

99
Kekistancoffee 99 points ago +99 / -0

So, I work with an NPC and run lots of this stuff by her.

So with this kind of evidence I'm told two things:

  1. Trump is a sore loser baby conspiracy theorist (literally exactly what Paul Revere has said).

  2. She truly believes that 100% of 23,000 ballots would come up for Biden without any down-ballot votes because "people hate Drumpf that much."

So... there you go. It's legit insanity clown-world nonsense that comes out of the mouth of the NPC.

16
BecMonTchew 16 points ago +16 / -0

And definitely 100% of all mail-in votes were for Biden, so that's totally what they were counting. Never mind that Trump was doing unprecedentedly well in mail-in votes before election day. Never mind that I personally have over a dozen relatives over 70 with sugar beetus that are worried about plandemic comorbidities that all voted for Trump by mail. All mail-in ballots were for Biden, bigot!

1
sentinel20 1 point ago +1 / -0

The statistical results for mail-in ballots was ridiculous, beyond statistically improbable. The election was probably stolen in a variety of ways; tampering with voting machines, dead people voting, adding illegitimate voters to the rolls on election night, changing electronic vote totals, preventing poll-watchers from viewing, etc, etc. but the NUMBER #1 source was definitely mail-in votes. If you were going to rig an election, you'd push for extensive mail-in voting. Why? It gives you plenty of time to rig up how many ballots you need. It gives you time to throw out the opposition's ballots. The chain of custody for these ballots passes through the US Postal Service -- which by the way endorsed Joe Biden!

The only question is: what fraud will be figured out before states are certified in the electoral college? Probably not enough. Unfortunately the true significance of fraud probably won't be known for years. My own estimate is that there is at an unexplainable difference of 250K votes in PA alone.