What did they concede? Nothing. Read the statement if you haven’t already. They just clarified their pre-existing position. “We don’t do legal advocacy. We didn’t pay Kyle to wear our shirt. We support vets.”
They support antifa by indirectly shitting on Kyle. Keep buying shit from people that hate you because they pretend to be right leaning, you mongoloid lol
Your point? I paraphrased. From this thread it’s clear there’s no uncertainty that they were referring to him. Was there something you think I paraphrased poorly?
What did they concede? Nothing. Read the statement if you haven’t already. They just clarified their pre-existing position. “We don’t do legal advocacy. We didn’t pay Kyle to wear our shirt. We support vets.”
They support antifa by indirectly shitting on Kyle. Keep buying shit from people that hate you because they pretend to be right leaning, you mongoloid lol
Hi OP. Block.
They didn’t even use Kyles name. You did. They Coldly and corporately said “17 year old.”
Your point? I paraphrased. From this thread it’s clear there’s no uncertainty that they were referring to him. Was there something you think I paraphrased poorly?
I will say one more time for you, my opinion is: They should have said they were proud of him for using that shirt
If it was just the statement, I would agree with you.
However, they cut sponsorship of a podcast whose only offense was sharing the picture.
https://mobile.twitter.com/blckriflecoffee/status/1330564755203846144
Then I guess we agree with each other! :)
Hey, that's good to see!