I hear the way they're manipulating the numbers is by increasing the cycles in the PCR test. If it spins for less time, less of the virus is detected and the result is negative. The more it spins, the more the virus can be isolated (resulting in a positive test) even if it's in such a small, trace amount that it's practically inconsequential.
I think the inventor, as well as the WHO state that any amplification over 30 cycles is useless and inaccurate. But, most states are amplifying 40-45 cycles, by what I've read. They amplify to the point that the test picks up non-dangerous and old particles which I understand are tracked everywhere like dust.
I hear the way they're manipulating the numbers is by increasing the cycles in the PCR test. If it spins for less time, less of the virus is detected and the result is negative. The more it spins, the more the virus can be isolated (resulting in a positive test) even if it's in such a small, trace amount that it's practically inconsequential.
I think the inventor, as well as the WHO state that any amplification over 30 cycles is useless and inaccurate. But, most states are amplifying 40-45 cycles, by what I've read. They amplify to the point that the test picks up non-dangerous and old particles which I understand are tracked everywhere like dust.