90
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Loscann 1 point ago +1 / -0

So wait, all it says is their policy is not to get involved in legal advocacy, and a podcast they supported apparently made a connection that wasnt there in the first place , and wouldnt clarify this was not an official endorsement so they lost the advertising. This turns into BRC turns its back on kyle?

Looks more like they want to stick to making good coffee and supporting veterans, and stay out of the chaos of everyday politics... what did I miss

1
Liskamm 1 point ago +1 / -0

You missed another silly attempt to divide and conquer. Those hating on BRC because they didn't cheer for Kyle appear as misguided as the ones demanding apologies and concessions.

As a company, they should stay out of legal proceedings and continue focus on their product.

1
Loscann 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right people doing exactly what they hate the left doing.....

1
Liskamm 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the irony; there is an awful lot of whining about a company staying neutral - which is what you'd want. Who the hell thinks a coffee roaster getting involved in any legal matters was a good idea anyway? I don't ask my butcher how to invest my money either.

But the sad thing is; it works. You think Under Armour is facing the same backlash? You would think so since Kyle wore one of their hats in the same picture that is causing all this commotion. But the lefties can't win much there, so they let that one slide.

Also, if you ever get a sponsorship, you'll soon understand why companies don't want to be associated with any topic like that and why any partnership would swiftly be terminated regardless of the outcome of the case or how individuals within a company feel about it.