109
Comments (6)
sorted by:
3
Ieggo 3 points ago +3 / -0

"there is no evidence" who destroyed the envelopes?

2
Wrexxis780 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its like a man finds out that his wife was raped and murdered by his neighbor, but the DNA testing finds out that although 99% of the rape test was the neighbors sperm... the 1% that was the husband makes it not true.

4
TonsOfSalt [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

The complete lack of concern for 14,000 dead people submitting a ballot is telling.

They just said to trust that they throw them out? How about they explain why dead people are voting and confirm if the vote was thrown out? Why is it my job to prove that the ballots that shouldn't have been there in the first place aren't being counted?

2
IntenseV8 2 points ago +2 / -0

The correct response is, "unless the person you found alive is the first person on the list, every person prior to the one you found is clear evidence of dead people voting."

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
OccasionalCortex21 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine forming your opinions from which way le factcheck needle faces lmao