Does anyone here know why in a number of court cases before a judge, Trump lawyers have been forced to specifically tell the court that they are NOT alleging fraud? I know they can lose licenses, but does that mean they have no evidence, or some other technicality?
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Technicality plus activist judges.
There are multiple court cases, some of them allege fraud, others alleging multiple other forms of illegal voting. The activist judges are forcing the lawyers on the non-fraud cases to reiterate that their specific case is not a fraud case just so they can get the misleading quotes for the papers.