Does anyone here know why in a number of court cases before a judge, Trump lawyers have been forced to specifically tell the court that they are NOT alleging fraud? I know they can lose licenses, but does that mean they have no evidence, or some other technicality?
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Perhaps they do not want that particular court to issue any ruling on fraud at this point...
The law is funny. If you get an opinion that goes against a facet of your case it can muddy things up down the road.