Does anyone here know why in a number of court cases before a judge, Trump lawyers have been forced to specifically tell the court that they are NOT alleging fraud? I know they can lose licenses, but does that mean they have no evidence, or some other technicality?
Comments (8)
sorted by:
ianal but a couple of lawsuits are about unequal application of the laws.
the lawsuit i read claimed that mail-in ballots are not held to the same standard as in-person voting.
this lawsuit wouldn't have claimed voter fraud took place, as it is not pertinent to the case.
so the judge asking legal counsel if voter fraud "took place" most likely did it for a sound bite.