If she is wrong, then she has sacrificed her career, her reputation, and any hope for a comfortable future.
Think on that and then decide if you're still worried she doesn't have the goods.
If she is wrong, then she has sacrificed her career, her reputation, and any hope for a comfortable future.
Think on that and then decide if you're still worried she doesn't have the goods.
And Trump too. He, and we, will look like absolute chumps.
I don't think GEOTUS is in the market for the chump look.
It's hard for people to have the same confidence in whats happening because Trump isn't outthere speaking, we get tweets from him but essentially it's just the people left to their own devices. Trump has to stay back for his safety. So there's no one to lead like he did previously.
That's why it's important to HOLD THE LINE!
If Trump had absolutely nothing, then he might bide his time trying to get something, but it wouldn't last very long, and then he'd either concede simply vanish from the public eye until inauguration day.
But what's been happening at DoD says he's got something big.
The fact that Powell and Giuliani have been so late on the legal side tells me they're not looking to win this in the courts. That's some balls right there, to be so sure of their ace up their sleeve. They're not betraying the President - he would know and have replaced them already.
So they're going for something else. They want to demonstrate to the Republican fencesitters in the legislatures that Biden and the dems have committed treason so spectacular that they simply cannot fail to elect Trump Electors, that to fail to do their duty would be the same as inviting a civil war really.
She always has the goods and is a born-again Christian and that is why she left behind a career as a prosecutor to fight prosecutors. She hated the lies. She's telling the truth.
All lawyers are grifters, but she cannot continue to grift, if she can't grift successfully. Her work with Flynn is a big testament to her ability to fight.
Not a bad point. Sure, she could spin to gaslight us, but not in a way that would destroy herself. My point is, even when putting aside judgements about her character and sticking entirely to logic, does anyone really think that lying or exaggerating about what evidence she has about something like this would be in her own rational self-interest?
There is no upside to going "all in". Book sales? Nope. More clients after this if it fails? Nope. Capping her very admirable career with the most public failure imaginable? Nope.
She either has the goods, or has lost her mind. Her resume does not indicate any mental instability. I admire her massive accomplishments. She is licensed to the Supreme Court, multiple federal courts, has 180 published opinions, lead counsel on 500 federal appeals, has been President of 5th Circuit Bar, was Phi Beta Kappa. She's probably talking a big game to keep eyes on it. Why else would a sane person set the bar so high?
She comes off as 100% no bullshit, and totally sane. She has a laser focus that can cut journalists in half. She doesn’t speak in that cryptic politician way, she’s saying things straight out, with so much confidence. I believe she already has this in the bag 👍
She and Rudy are the public face of this. Donald Trump, I believe is the public face of this. This can only be a Military operation.. They analyzed 2016, observed 2018 and literally recorded everything in this election. A rogue server somewhere would be the MOAB!!!!!!
Would be a befitting day for the tide to turn!!!!!
Wednesday would be a great day for that. We would all talk about it endlessly over Thanksgiving dinner. Or Friday. Then the dems can call it Black Friday for the events rather than the shopping.
This, together with her impeccable track record makes it a no-brainer. How the left can struggle with such simple reasoning is beyond me.
“I don’t make comments without the evidence to back it up” – Sidney Powell
She has the goods.
Lots of people just have a hard time to understand we live in a world with some serious messed up people who see themselves as top of the food chain, with those down being mere peasants, working bees, resources for whatever objective they have at the top.
All the kickbacks, pedophilia, child sacrifice, organ harvesting, and whatever will come out. Still people won't believe such cruelty actually exists because they can hardly perceive.
Logical outcome of rejecting the Creator.... Law of the jungle...
EXACTLY what I've been trying to tell people! There is no way Rudy, Sidney, Lin, and all these other very successful lawyers are throwing away their reputations for Trump. It simply wouldn't happen, period. I haven't seen a single, high-profile lawyer with a history of success claiming that there is no election fraud, at all. It's all low-level DNC hacks that nobody cares about. When zero lawyers, statisticians, or other professionals are coming out for the other side you know there must be some serious stuff going on.
Not to mention that if they aren't telling the truth they are repeatedly and publicly committing defamation against a private entity. I just don't see experienced lawyers making such a stupid mistake.
She probably has the goods but we know the MSM will not acknowledge it and it is a toss up as to what the courts will do.
If she has what she claims she has, it's not really a toss up at all.
If she doesn't have what she claims she has, her life is over, which means she most likely wouldn't have claimed it if she didn't have it.
Thus, don't worry. Kick your feet up, pop some popcorn, and watch the show with your gleefully mischievous grin planted firmly on your face.
Don’t forget to prepare for civil war😉
No matter what evidence comes forward, the entire democrat party, the mainstream media, and every lefty out there is gonna say "thats it???"
At this point it doesnt matter what receipts are put forward. Video evidence. Audio evidence. Statistical proof. Sworn affidavits from 10s of thousands of people. NOTHING will be enough. Their false reality does not accept anything from the real reality. Look at the mountains of evidence already out there, and they deny ALL OF IT.
I'm more worried about her saying she could file this 'a month from now' and the states would all have to decertify their elections.
A month is too late.
There's 3 weeks to get everything done. Filing in circuit court, evidence cross examined, appealing, appealing to Supremes, Supremes deciding to throw out illegal votes, states pretending to recount without illegal votes, injuctions to make them actually do it, appeal back to Supremes, lawsuits to make them reselect their slate that they already decided on, etc.
But, being hyperbolic about "month from now", which is a statement meant to express how good her evidence is, won't ruin her life. Failure would.
Think about it. Would you jump out of a plane if you hadn't checked your parachute?
She jumped out of the plane.
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
I lost it at "0.6 m"
I have to say I really enjoyed reading that study.
"Conclusions Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice."
I hope it was a figure of speech. I assume it was.
But after Dec 14th it's done.
I have watched hours of interviews and talks by Sidney Powell and she is a woman of sterling integrity. If she says she has the goods, she has the goods.
You could also hear it in her delivery that she is absolutely outraged and what she’s discovered. She was literally shaking.
OP, that's not a strong argument.
She is 65 years old. How much career do you think she still has to look forward to? And retirees often tend to not care about their reputation.
I hope she got what she says she got, but some of the things she claims make no sense to me. If Kemp is dirty and taking bribes, why is she talking about it on Newsmax while Trump's campaign is asking for a second audit?
at this point, the real big bomb as far as I see are the testimonies of people saying they didn't vote vs. state records saying they did. When it was just a few, not a big deal, but we now have datasets where it allegedly 50% out of over a thousand test? That's huge.
She would be disbarred, likely lose her pension, and be subject to a gigantic defamation lawsuit. Still think it's not a strong argument?
her getting disbarred if she is 65 and probably won't bother practicing much more is not really a consequence and I doubt a lawyer of her stature cares about her capped government pension - she is likely a multi-millionaire.
As for defamation suit - you are right, that is an actual risk.
Mind you, in US defamation is seriously tough to prove in cases like this. They would have to prove that she knew she was lying - she probably won't actually lose, but there is risk of her getting dragged through courts over it for a while.
That’s what I’m say....she must have it or thinks she has it.
Yes. While cnns anonymous sources would not even go on the record.
Everything that's been uncovered seems to be true and the biggest hurdle she is gonna have is getting it to stick in court. The biggest test is the courts. It will show how corrupt the system really is if this fails imo.
The courts can decide how many millions die.
I do think this is right.
My current take is that what Team Trump has is going to convince the public that several dems, including Biden, have committed treason, and that will make the Republican legislature fence sitters jump. The SCOTUS won't be needed.
They just happened to have stopped counting at four AM, then completely by coincidence kicked out all republican poll watchers, and miraculously Joe Biden got so many votes that he even BTFO Barrack Hussein from those exact votes. Seems like a legit election to me. 🤡🌎
I don't care about if some fancy ass blue checkmark lawyer has to retire a few years early. Bill Buckner and Scott Norwood went thought that same kinda "suffering" and it didn't seem hurt too much.
She has the goods, we have to be patient and keep up the pressure, they need the support to win this.
Her resume is solid. This woman is in the .01% of top lawyers. She isn’t a politicianlawyer like Rudy. No offense to him.
Not disagreeing, but that's irrelevant. The point is that she is breaking the law if she is not telling the truth. I doubt that she's willing to risk being disbarred and sued by a corporation for that.
I think they have collected so much shit over the last four years they are probably laughing about it.
If she effs up, Trump can just fire her and keep going.
If she effs up, she is breaking the law. Since she is a successful lawyer and knows the consequence, I doubt she's effing up.
She could eff up without breaking the law IF some witness is a fake witness, who lies under oath and basically sets up her up to fail.
Sid could present circumstantial statistical data that to most people would “prove” fraud. The problem is it being circumstantial. Getting statistically ignorant judges to agree is going to be difficult. It would be a way to save face. She could claim the proof was there but the judges refused to see it for the rest of her career.
Here is my skeptical opinion - the more she talks, the less believable it gets. Let me give you an example. If I know you as an honest person and you tell me you have the biggest dog but for some reason can't show it - I'd most likely believe you. Then you come back and tell you also have a humongous cat but still can't show me - I may still believe you based on your past reputation but may start doubting. And then you come back and say you also have a fire-breathing dragon on a chain. And at this point I can't take you at face value anymore - start showing or stop telling. She doesn't need to convince people on this board - she needs to convince skeptics (including the ones sympathetic to her cause), normies, and some of the opposition. And right now, she is failing at that. Or perhaps her claims are just a smoke screen and the real game is happening behind the scenes - just an idea.
None of the above. She only needs to convince a judge. Can't be a smokescreen. That would make what she is doing defamation and she would be disbarred.
What you need to realize is that what she is doing is illegal if she is wrong. This is not a big fish story; this would be actionable in court and she would lose everything.
Regardless of what you think about her honesty, she would be stupid to do this if she doesn't have something to show for it. She wouldn't have become as successful as she is if she were stupid.
If she only needs to convince a judge then why is she doing interviews? Judge convincing happens in court - interviews are for the public. She could have saved it all for the court case - she chose not to. Making all these claims on TV before the cases have been filed undermines the credibility of the claims including for a judge.
That part is theater. I don't doubt she likes the attention.
But the fact remains that being wrong would destroy her life. Credibility is irrelevant. Incentive and self-preservation suggests she's not wrong.
We don't know what her incentive is - any assumption in that regard is a speculation at best. It can be what we hope it to be, or it can be something we can't even imagine. The more claims she makes and the bigger they get - the more it feels like a smoke screen. Theater requires an audience and right now only the avid fans seem to be staying in their seats with the rest of an auditorium getting empty. And we on this board are not helping by going after sceptics who upto this point were sympathetic to our cause.
she is a boomer and boomers dont understand technology she will forever have millions of Q followers who will ask her to release the kraken
We're tired of waiting. Stop fucking around already.
That's just not how the legal process works.